686
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 132:
Line 132: + +
→Important elements to include in the Article
::::Robert, so there is a double standard? TOE article for example is full of opposing views, most are creationist views. So why allow that on the TOE page and not on this page?--[[User:Tims|TimS]] 13:55, 8 May 2007 (EDT)
::::Robert, so there is a double standard? TOE article for example is full of opposing views, most are creationist views. So why allow that on the TOE page and not on this page?--[[User:Tims|TimS]] 13:55, 8 May 2007 (EDT)
::::By the way, I do not think you (Robert) are wrong in this view, personaly I believe that the POVs should not be in the articles, when the articles are discriptions of ideas.--[[User:Tims|TimS]] 13:56, 8 May 2007 (EDT)