Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, Check users, delete, edit, move, oversight, protect, rollback, Administrators
51,035
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 366:
Line 366: + Line 371:
Line 372: +
Donald Trump achievements: The courts (view source)
Revision as of 01:37, February 22, 2019
, 01:37, February 22, 2019→2019
*Swoyer, Alex (February 20, 2019). [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/feb/20/court-constitutional-ban-on-high-fines-applies-to-/ Supreme Court rules states may not impose excessive fines]. ''The Washington Times''. Retrieved February 20, 2019.
*Swoyer, Alex (February 20, 2019). [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/feb/20/court-constitutional-ban-on-high-fines-applies-to-/ Supreme Court rules states may not impose excessive fines]. ''The Washington Times''. Retrieved February 20, 2019.
*Bravin, Jess (February 20, 2019). [https://www.wsj.com/articles/supreme-court-rules-against-excessive-state-fines-11550680782 Supreme Court Rules Against Excessive State Fines]. ''The Wall Street Journal''. Retrieved February 20, 2019.
*Bravin, Jess (February 20, 2019). [https://www.wsj.com/articles/supreme-court-rules-against-excessive-state-fines-11550680782 Supreme Court Rules Against Excessive State Fines]. ''The Wall Street Journal''. Retrieved February 20, 2019.
*Byas, Steve (February 21, 2019). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/item/31532-unanimous-supreme-court-excessive-fines-unconstitutional Unanimous Supreme Court: Excessive Fines Unconstitutional]. ''The New American''. Retrieved February 21, 2019.
*Quinn, Melissa (February 20, 2019). [https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/courts/supreme-court-rules-constitutions-ban-on-excessive-fines-applies-to-the-states Supreme Court rules against 'excessive' seizure of property by states]. ''Washington Examiner''. Retrieved February 20, 2019.
*Quinn, Melissa (February 20, 2019). [https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/courts/supreme-court-rules-constitutions-ban-on-excessive-fines-applies-to-the-states Supreme Court rules against 'excessive' seizure of property by states]. ''Washington Examiner''. Retrieved February 20, 2019.
*Wheeler, Lydia (February 20, 2019). [https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/430742-supreme-court-clamps-down-on-excessive-fines-by-states Supreme Court clamps down on 'excessive fines' by states]. ''The Hill''. Retrieved February 20, 2019.
*Wheeler, Lydia (February 20, 2019). [https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/430742-supreme-court-clamps-down-on-excessive-fines-by-states Supreme Court clamps down on 'excessive fines' by states]. ''The Hill''. Retrieved February 20, 2019.
See also:
See also:
*Klukowski, Ken (February 20, 2019). [https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/02/20/justice-clarence-thomas-takes-constitutional-stand-in-indiana-suv-seizure-case/ Justice Clarence Thomas Takes Constitutional Stand in Indiana SUV Seizure Case]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved February 21, 2019.
*Klukowski, Ken (February 20, 2019). [https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/02/20/justice-clarence-thomas-takes-constitutional-stand-in-indiana-suv-seizure-case/ Justice Clarence Thomas Takes Constitutional Stand in Indiana SUV Seizure Case]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved February 21, 2019.
*[https://www.wsj.com/articles/justices-against-unjust-forfeiture-11550708786 Justices Against Unjust Forfeiture]. ''The Wall Street Journal''. February 20, 2019. Retrieved February 21, 2019.
*Wolverton, Joe (September 16, 2018). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/constitution/item/30084-supreme-court-to-hear-indiana-civil-asset-forfeiture-case Supreme Court to Hear Indiana Civil Asset Forfeiture Case]. ''The New American''. Retrieved February 20, 2019.</ref> It also allowed a Fifth Circuit ruling to stand that protected pro-life Roman Catholic bishops in Texas from having to release private documents because an abortion clinic demanded it.<ref>Multiple references:
*Wolverton, Joe (September 16, 2018). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/constitution/item/30084-supreme-court-to-hear-indiana-civil-asset-forfeiture-case Supreme Court to Hear Indiana Civil Asset Forfeiture Case]. ''The New American''. Retrieved February 20, 2019.</ref> It also allowed a Fifth Circuit ruling to stand that protected pro-life Roman Catholic bishops in Texas from having to release private documents because an abortion clinic demanded it.<ref>Multiple references:
*Barillas, Martin M. (February 19, 2019). [https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/supreme-court-resists-abortionists-attack-on-catholic-bishops-privacy-buryi Supreme Court resists abortionists’ attack on Catholic bishops, privacy, burying aborted babies]. ''LifeSiteNews''. Retrieved February 20, 2019.
*Barillas, Martin M. (February 19, 2019). [https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/supreme-court-resists-abortionists-attack-on-catholic-bishops-privacy-buryi Supreme Court resists abortionists’ attack on Catholic bishops, privacy, burying aborted babies]. ''LifeSiteNews''. Retrieved February 20, 2019.