1,792
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 142:
Line 142: + +
→Important elements to include in the Article: You are right, the Astronomy article is garbage
:::::: Lol, perhaps you should... The consistancy of a lot of the articles seem to be in question when you look at the TOE article and compare it to others on the site. Perhaps some form or standard should be provided. I mentioned to Andy about the Astronomy article containing 22% information on Astronomy, 64% YEC views and 14% counters to YEC views. Seems to not provide a clear definition of what the topic is.--[[User:Tims|TimS]] 14:44, 8 May 2007 (EDT)
:::::: Lol, perhaps you should... The consistancy of a lot of the articles seem to be in question when you look at the TOE article and compare it to others on the site. Perhaps some form or standard should be provided. I mentioned to Andy about the Astronomy article containing 22% information on Astronomy, 64% YEC views and 14% counters to YEC views. Seems to not provide a clear definition of what the topic is.--[[User:Tims|TimS]] 14:44, 8 May 2007 (EDT)
::::::: You are right, the [[Astronomy]] article is garbage. It doesn't even describe the views of the YEC folks very well, and instead has silly cheap shots. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 15:43, 8 May 2007 (EDT)