Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
1,595 bytes added ,  19:59, March 3, 2019
no edit summary
Line 13: Line 13:  
Since God is rigorously self-consistent, the basic pattern of His thoughts can be described at least partly by exception-less, unchanging, universal laws.  We call these laws of logic.  For example, God never denies or contradicts Himself (2 Timothy 2:13).  Therefore, truth will never contradict truth.  We call this the law of non-contradiction.  In order for something to be true, it must correspond to the mind of God.  Therefore, truthful things will never violate laws of logic.  Truth always matches God’s thinking, with no exceptions.<ref>[https://biblicalscienceinstitute.com/logic/is-christianity-irrational/ Is Christianity Irrational?] by Dr. Lisle</ref>}}
 
Since God is rigorously self-consistent, the basic pattern of His thoughts can be described at least partly by exception-less, unchanging, universal laws.  We call these laws of logic.  For example, God never denies or contradicts Himself (2 Timothy 2:13).  Therefore, truth will never contradict truth.  We call this the law of non-contradiction.  In order for something to be true, it must correspond to the mind of God.  Therefore, truthful things will never violate laws of logic.  Truth always matches God’s thinking, with no exceptions.<ref>[https://biblicalscienceinstitute.com/logic/is-christianity-irrational/ Is Christianity Irrational?] by Dr. Lisle</ref>}}
   −
J. Warner Waller of the Cold Case Christianity organization indicates:
+
J. Warner Wallace of the Cold Case Christianity organization indicates:
 
{{Cquote|If God exists, He is the absolute, objective, transcendent standard of truth. The Laws of Logic are simply a reflection of the nature of God.
 
{{Cquote|If God exists, He is the absolute, objective, transcendent standard of truth. The Laws of Logic are simply a reflection of the nature of God.
   −
The Christian Worldview accounts for the existence of the transcendent Laws of Logic. If God exists, He is the absolute, objective, transcendent standard of truth. The Laws of Logic are simply a reflection of the nature of God. God did not create these laws. They are a reflection of His rational thinking, and for this reason, they are as eternal as God Himself. You and I, as humans, have the ability to discover these laws because we have been created in the image of God, but we don’t create or invent the laws. As an atheist, however, I rejected this conclusion and offered a number of alternative explanations related to the Laws of Logic. Is God Real? The Laws of Logic (much like the [https://coldcasechristianity.com/2014/is-god-real-the-case-from-cosmology/ appearance of our universe from nothing]) provide us with evidence establishing the most reasonable inference: God exists and has created a universe in which we can find and know Him.<ref>[https://coldcasechristianity.com/writings/is-god-real-evidence-from-the-laws-of-logic/ Is God Real? Evidence from the Laws of Logic] by J. Warner Waller</ref>}}
+
The Christian Worldview accounts for the existence of the transcendent Laws of Logic. If God exists, He is the absolute, objective, transcendent standard of truth. The Laws of Logic are simply a reflection of the nature of God. God did not create these laws. They are a reflection of His rational thinking, and for this reason, they are as eternal as God Himself. You and I, as humans, have the ability to discover these laws because we have been created in the image of God, but we don’t create or invent the laws. As an atheist, however, I rejected this conclusion and offered a number of alternative explanations related to the Laws of Logic. Is God Real? The Laws of Logic (much like the [https://coldcasechristianity.com/2014/is-god-real-the-case-from-cosmology/ appearance of our universe from nothing]) provide us with evidence establishing the most reasonable inference: God exists and has created a universe in which we can find and know Him.<ref>[https://coldcasechristianity.com/writings/is-god-real-evidence-from-the-laws-of-logic/ Is God Real? Evidence from the Laws of Logic] by J. Warner Wallace</ref>}}
    
Dr. Lisle also wrote:
 
Dr. Lisle also wrote:
Line 22: Line 22:     
However, sometimes the critic asserts that the Bible has actually violated a law of logic; he claims that two passages in the Scriptures are contradictory. This is a more serious challenge, because two contradictory statements cannot both be true—even in principle. If the Bible actually endorsed two contradictory statements, then necessarily one of them would have to be false, and the Bible could not be totally inerrant. In reality, most alleged contradictions turn out to be nothing of the kind. They simply reveal that the critic does not truly understand what a contradiction is. A contradiction is “A and not A at the same time and in the same relationship” where A is any proposition. To contradict is to both affirm and deny the same proposition. And this is not the nature of most alleged biblical contradictions.<ref>[https://answersingenesis.org/logic/is-the-christian-worldview-logical/ Is the Christian Worldview Logical?] by Dr. Jason Lisle</ref>}}   
 
However, sometimes the critic asserts that the Bible has actually violated a law of logic; he claims that two passages in the Scriptures are contradictory. This is a more serious challenge, because two contradictory statements cannot both be true—even in principle. If the Bible actually endorsed two contradictory statements, then necessarily one of them would have to be false, and the Bible could not be totally inerrant. In reality, most alleged contradictions turn out to be nothing of the kind. They simply reveal that the critic does not truly understand what a contradiction is. A contradiction is “A and not A at the same time and in the same relationship” where A is any proposition. To contradict is to both affirm and deny the same proposition. And this is not the nature of most alleged biblical contradictions.<ref>[https://answersingenesis.org/logic/is-the-christian-worldview-logical/ Is the Christian Worldview Logical?] by Dr. Jason Lisle</ref>}}   
 +
 +
Melinda Penner of the Stand To Reason organization states:
 +
{{Cquote|Christianity can be seen as an explanatory hypothesis to account for certain phenomena we observe in the world: the origin of the universe, the design of the universe, and the universality of morality. The explanations that Christianity provides to this empirical data provide a cumulative case for the rationality of Christianity, and in fact, the superiority of Christianity to other belief systems. Monotheistic religions (namely Judaism, Islam, and Christianity) enjoy a special rational advantage over other kinds of religious beliefs in their explanatory power, but, as will be shown, Christianity is the most rationally satisfying. Three criteria can be applied to developing the positive case for Christianity and simultaneously the negative case against other religious belief claims: logical consistency, empirical adequacy, and existential viability.
 +
 +
Logical consistency seems to be more "cut and dry" than the other two criteria. Logic is a natural function of human minds and is universally practiced. In fact, the universality of logic itself needs to be explained in a religious worldview. Many religious beliefs can be dismissed at the outset because they fail this first criterion, for example eastern religions that deny rationality and logic. They not only cannot account for logic, they fail the test of rationality since they hold contradictory beliefs.<ref>[https://www.str.org/articles/christianity-as-the-best-explanation#.XHwwnIhKg2w Christianity as the Best Explanation] by Melinda Penner</ref>}}
    
== See also ==
 
== See also ==
Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,435

edits

Navigation menu