Changes

:::Well here is my 2 cents.  I think the biggest problem facing Conservapedia right now is that a majority of the editors only care about highly controversial political/social topics.  The good thing about Wikipedia is it is a good starting point for all sorts of topics.  Regardless of bias, people are going to visit Wikipedia more often when they want general information on something, and people will come here to read the discussion pages and political bickering between people.  For example, I know all about the conservative/creationist viewpoints on evolution now, but all I can find out about a rabbit is that it is a small mammal.  Wikipedia currently provides a great starting place for a wider variety of information than here. --[[User:Colest|Colest]] 17:18, 8 May 2007 (EDT)

:::Well here is my 2 cents.  I think the biggest problem facing Conservapedia right now is that a majority of the editors only care about highly controversial political/social topics.  The good thing about Wikipedia is it is a good starting point for all sorts of topics.  Regardless of bias, people are going to visit Wikipedia more often when they want general information on something, and people will come here to read the discussion pages and political bickering between people.  For example, I know all about the conservative/creationist viewpoints on evolution now, but all I can find out about a rabbit is that it is a small mammal.  Wikipedia currently provides a great starting place for a wider variety of information than here. --[[User:Colest|Colest]] 17:18, 8 May 2007 (EDT)