Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
14,708
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 29:
Line 29: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
→Global warming is too a hoax: reply
:::It's also worth noting, that the earth's core is cooling down. When it solidifies (if the earth exists that long as it currently is), the electromagnetic field protecting the earth will disappear, and the next solar wild with promptly remove our atmosphere, killing pretty much everyone on the planet. I believe that will never actually happen, because I believe in intelligent design. However, shouldn't we be worried about this, rather than trying to cool the earth down more? --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">DavidB4</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</sup> 18:12, 7 March 2019 (EST)
:::It's also worth noting, that the earth's core is cooling down. When it solidifies (if the earth exists that long as it currently is), the electromagnetic field protecting the earth will disappear, and the next solar wild with promptly remove our atmosphere, killing pretty much everyone on the planet. I believe that will never actually happen, because I believe in intelligent design. However, shouldn't we be worried about this, rather than trying to cool the earth down more? --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">DavidB4</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</sup> 18:12, 7 March 2019 (EST)
===Global warming is too a hoax===
:[[Francis Bacon]] wrote this about the [[sharpshooter fallacy]] (or in this case more precisely the fallacy of positive instances) in Shakespeare's day:
::For the mind of man is far from the nature of a clear and equal glass, wherein the beams of things should reflect according to their true incidence; nay, it is rather like an enchanted glass, full of superstition and imposture, if it be not delivered and reduced.
::For this purpose, let us consider the false appearances that are imposed upon us by the general nature of the mind, beholding them in an example or two; as first, in that instance which is the root of all superstition, namely, that to the nature of the mind of all men it is consonant for the affirmative or active to affect more than the negative or privative.
::So that a few times hitting or presence countervails ofttimes failing or absence, as was well answered by [[Diagoras of Melos|Diagoras]] to him that showed him in Neptune’s temple the great number of pictures of such as had escaped shipwreck, and had paid their vows to Neptune, saying, “Advise now, you that think it folly to invocate Neptune in tempest.” “Yea, but,” saith Diagoras, “where are they painted that are drowned?” (''Advancement of Learning'', 1605)
:If there are places in the world where yearly temperature records are broken during the year when there are less than 200 years of recorded data to select from with thousands of localities to choose from and dozens of ways to "break records", is that really surprising? Actually, the surprising thing would be if there were no records broken. And yet the "climate change" community of interests have even picked up on this too. While researching the footnotes for the [[Global warming]] article, I found an article about "climate stagnation" which claims we need to worry if ''fewer'' records are broken.
:More evidence: championing a policy of "carbon pollution" reduction, while the greenhouse gas (in addition to water vapor [commonly known as "steam" or "humidity" so hard to convince people to reduce]) is carbon dioxide not carbon. "It's short for carbon dioxide". But carbon and carbon dioxide are very different: One is black soot and the other is breathed out of your mouth.
:Carbon by itself isn't even a greenhouse gas but it ''sounds'' more polluting than "carbon dioxide". "Naming carbon for carbon dioxide isn't a big deal; it's part of the whole anti-pollution package." But carbon emissions have been reduced to one fourth of their former production per year over the last century despite the jump of billions more in world population. Part of that was due to the [[Clean Air Act]], advanced by [[George Bush]] in the early 1990s.
:It almost seems as if the more pollution problems that get solved, the greater the pollution crisis becomes, and the more the already solved problems get forgotten. So permit me to respond in a language Congresswoman [[Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez]] can understand: What's up with that?
:There's no time to get into how "climate skeptics" are called "deniers" (analogous to "[[holocaust]] deniers)—whenever I try to campaign to advance a major controversial theory or policy where potentially dire economic consequences are involved, I don't know about you, but I insult those who challenge the unproven assumptions put forward by my community of interests and make sweeping motions to disperse all engagement in discussion.
:It's an attempt to troll conservatives into galled reaction, by pretending to more and more not know how to gather the necessary facts to justify their political measures just as those measures grow and grow and previous anti-pollution measures become more and more forgotten and ignored—as in Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's resolution to "mobilize" (in other words prepare as for total war) the United States economy around "climate change" claims. [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) 23:01, 7 March 2019 (EST)