Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, Check users, delete, edit, move, oversight, protect, rollback, Administrators
51,035
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 79:
Line 79: + +
→Positive
Anthony Hayes of the ''Baltimore Post-Examiner'' positively reviewed the film, stating that "''Is Genesis History?'' succinctly lays out the scientific case for a special creation; then asks the question, 'How does a little information from the past affect how one lives today?'"<ref>Hayes, Anthony (February 25, 2017). [http://baltimorepostexaminer.com/genesis-history-new-film-ably-addresses-age-old-question/2017/02/25#sthash.sD6XN8Fb.WEJO6gFv.dpbs Is Genesis History? New film ably addresses age-old question]. ''Baltimore Post-Examiner''. Retrieved March 14, 2017.</ref>
Anthony Hayes of the ''Baltimore Post-Examiner'' positively reviewed the film, stating that "''Is Genesis History?'' succinctly lays out the scientific case for a special creation; then asks the question, 'How does a little information from the past affect how one lives today?'"<ref>Hayes, Anthony (February 25, 2017). [http://baltimorepostexaminer.com/genesis-history-new-film-ably-addresses-age-old-question/2017/02/25#sthash.sD6XN8Fb.WEJO6gFv.dpbs Is Genesis History? New film ably addresses age-old question]. ''Baltimore Post-Examiner''. Retrieved March 14, 2017.</ref>
In March 2019, Alex Newman of ''[[The New American]]'' cited the film as an example of the growing scientific dissent from evolutionary theory.<ref>Newman, Alex (March 11, 2019). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/item/31694-over-1-000-scientists-openly-dissent-from-evolution-theory Over 1,000 Scientists Openly Dissent From Evolution Theory]. ''The New American''. Retrieved March 17, 2019.</ref>
===Negative===
===Negative===