Block, SkipCaptcha, apieditor, Automoderated users, Bots, edit, ratelimit-exempt
58,187
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 10:
Line 10: − + Line 43:
Line 43: − +
HTTP --> HTTPS, replaced: http://www.bbc.co.uk → https://www.bbc.co.uk, http://www.conservativenewsandviews.com → https://www.conservativenewsandviews.com
The BBC television coverage is often cited for WTC-7-related conspiracy theories, as it reports WTC-7's collapse before it actually happened.<ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PNK1V6S2cbo</ref> WTTG (Washington DC's Fox affiliate) also makes this mistake.<ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xrEl4Lxok0Y</ref> Coverage from CNN used the phrase "may collapse".<ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N1LetB0z8_o</ref>
The BBC television coverage is often cited for WTC-7-related conspiracy theories, as it reports WTC-7's collapse before it actually happened.<ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PNK1V6S2cbo</ref> WTTG (Washington DC's Fox affiliate) also makes this mistake.<ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xrEl4Lxok0Y</ref> Coverage from CNN used the phrase "may collapse".<ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N1LetB0z8_o</ref>
The BBC's official explanation was that the fire authorities expected the collapse, and claims the press was informed of this, which would support the CNN account.<ref>http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theeditors/2008/07/controversy_conspiracies_iii.html</ref>
The BBC's official explanation was that the fire authorities expected the collapse, and claims the press was informed of this, which would support the CNN account.<ref>https://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theeditors/2008/07/controversy_conspiracies_iii.html</ref>
==Black smoke==
==Black smoke==
*[http://www.globalresearch.ca/911-questions-remain-unanswered-david-ray-griffin-speaks-out/5304310 9/11 Questions Remain Unanswered. David Ray Griffin Speaks Out.]
*[http://www.globalresearch.ca/911-questions-remain-unanswered-david-ray-griffin-speaks-out/5304310 9/11 Questions Remain Unanswered. David Ray Griffin Speaks Out.]
*[http://www.conservativenewsandviews.com/2014/09/20/accountability/legislative/congress-thinking/ Congress, are you thinking?]
*[https://www.conservativenewsandviews.com/2014/09/20/accountability/legislative/congress-thinking/ Congress, are you thinking?]
==References==
==References==