Changes

|url=

|url=

|language=Slovak

|language=Slovak

}}</ref> [[LGBT]]I campaigners have been using the language of rights<ref name="Sprigg2007">{{cite web |title=Homosexuality Is Not a Civil Right |author=Peter Sprigg |publisher=Family Research Council |date=2007 |place=Washington, D.C. |url=http://www.frc.org/get.cfm?i=BC07I01 |quote=The stories of Rosa Parks and Martin Luther King, Jr. have become an inspiring part of American history. It’s not surprising that homosexual activists have tried to hitch their [[caboose]] to the “civil rights” train. They do this in the context of efforts to change the definition of marriage in order to allow same-sex “marriages” (by comparing same-sex “marriage” to interracial marriage) and efforts to pass “hate crime” laws (which stigmatize opposition to homosexual behavior as a form of “hate” comparable to racism). The |accessdate=18 Nov 2014}}</ref> in an attempt to add moral force to what are nothing more than personal desires.{{#tag:ref|cf. [[Homo-fascism#LGBTI Bundling|LGBT+ bundling]]|group=note}} In many cases they have bypassed the democratic process and succeeded in imposing their views on the rest of the population by force of law given not by parliaments but created from judicial bench by means of [[judicial activism]].<ref>{{cite web |title=Gay marriage is not a 'human right': European ruling torpedoes Coalition stance |author=Steve Doughty |publisher=Associated Newspapers Ltd; Part of the Daily Mail |date=20 March 2012 |url=http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2117920/Gay-marriage-human-right-European-ruling-torpedoes-Coalition-stance.html |quote=Norman Wells, of the Family Education Trust, said: ‘For too long campaigners have been using the language of rights in an attempt to add moral force to what are nothing more than personal desires. ‘In many cases they have bypassed the democratic process and succeeded in imposing their views on the rest of the population by force of law. ‘We are seeing the same principle at work in the Government’s sham of a consultation on same-sex marriage.’ He added: ‘The ruling from the ECHR will embolden those whose concerns about same-sex marriage and adoption are not inspired by personal hatred and animosity, but by a genuine concern for the well-being of children and the welfare of society. ‘Instead of rushing to legislate without seriously considering the views of the electorate, the Government should be encouraging a measured public debate on the nature and meaning of marriage.’ |accessdate=11 October 2015}}</ref> In [[Roman law]] this type of judicial activity made for the purpose of fullfiling the sensual lust and sexual bodily urges was titled ''Libidinis causa''. The legal causes outwardly pretending the just cause but in fact hiding the real intentions and will of their originators were termed in [[Latin]] as ''Dissimulatio'' and Servius (Ulp. D.4,3,1,2) labeled them as [[deception]] (''dolorum malum'').<ref>{{cite book |author=Karol Rebro |title=Latinské právnicke výrazy a výroky |publisher=Iura edition |year=1995 |pages=100–1, 173 |isbn=80-88715-20-2 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=I54hPQAACAAJ |quote=za účelom žiadostivosti, zmyselnosti |language=Slovak}}</ref> [[Francis Bacon]] regarded as negative phenomenon the ''dissimulation'' when a man lets fall signs and arguments, that he is not, that he is [here: [[Human being]] belonging to [[humankind]] that consists of two complementary [[sex]]es — [[male]] and [[female]]{{#tag:ref|cf. [[Gedankenexperiment#Marriage vs. Homosexual Life-style]] and [[Natural order]]|group=note}}]; and called as ''simulation'' the situation when a man industriously and expressly feigns and pretends to be [here: LGBT+{{#tag:ref|cf. [[Ideomotor effect]]|group=note}}], that he is not.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.authorama.com/essays-of-francis-bacon-7.html |author=Francis Bacon |title=Essays of Francis Bacon:Of Simulation and Dissimulation |quote=There be three degrees of this hiding and veiling of a man’s self. The first, closeness, reservation, and secrecy; when a man leaveth himself without observation, or without hold to be taken, what he is. The second, dissimulation, in the negative; when a man lets fall signs and arguments, that he is not, that he is. And the third, simulation, in the affirmative; when a man industriously and expressly feigns and pretends to be, that he is not.|accessdate=9 Jul 2016}}</ref>

}}</ref> [[LGBT]]I campaigners have been using the language of rights<ref name="Sprigg2007">{{cite web |title=Homosexuality Is Not a Civil Right |author=Peter Sprigg |publisher=Family Research Council |date=2007 |place=Washington, D.C. |url=http://www.frc.org/get.cfm?i=BC07I01 |quote=The stories of Rosa Parks and Martin Luther King, Jr. have become an inspiring part of American history. It’s not surprising that homosexual activists have tried to hitch their [[caboose]] to the “civil rights” train. They do this in the context of efforts to change the definition of marriage in order to allow same-sex “marriages” (by comparing same-sex “marriage” to interracial marriage) and efforts to pass “hate crime” laws (which stigmatize opposition to homosexual behavior as a form of “hate” comparable to racism). The |accessdate=18 Nov 2014}}</ref> in an attempt to add moral force to what are nothing more than personal desires.{{#tag:ref|cf. [[Homo-fascism#LGBTI Bundling|LGBT+ bundling]]|group=note}} In many cases they have bypassed the democratic process and succeeded in imposing their views on the rest of the population by force of law given not by parliaments but created from judicial bench by means of [[judicial activism]].<ref>{{cite web |title=Gay marriage is not a 'human right': European ruling torpedoes Coalition stance |author=Steve Doughty |publisher=Associated Newspapers Ltd; Part of the Daily Mail |date=20 March 2012 |url=https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2117920/Gay-marriage-human-right-European-ruling-torpedoes-Coalition-stance.html |quote=Norman Wells, of the Family Education Trust, said: ‘For too long campaigners have been using the language of rights in an attempt to add moral force to what are nothing more than personal desires. ‘In many cases they have bypassed the democratic process and succeeded in imposing their views on the rest of the population by force of law. ‘We are seeing the same principle at work in the Government’s sham of a consultation on same-sex marriage.’ He added: ‘The ruling from the ECHR will embolden those whose concerns about same-sex marriage and adoption are not inspired by personal hatred and animosity, but by a genuine concern for the well-being of children and the welfare of society. ‘Instead of rushing to legislate without seriously considering the views of the electorate, the Government should be encouraging a measured public debate on the nature and meaning of marriage.’ |accessdate=11 October 2015}}</ref> In [[Roman law]] this type of judicial activity made for the purpose of fullfiling the sensual lust and sexual bodily urges was titled ''Libidinis causa''. The legal causes outwardly pretending the just cause but in fact hiding the real intentions and will of their originators were termed in [[Latin]] as ''Dissimulatio'' and Servius (Ulp. D.4,3,1,2) labeled them as [[deception]] (''dolorum malum'').<ref>{{cite book |author=Karol Rebro |title=Latinské právnicke výrazy a výroky |publisher=Iura edition |year=1995 |pages=100–1, 173 |isbn=80-88715-20-2 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=I54hPQAACAAJ |quote=za účelom žiadostivosti, zmyselnosti |language=Slovak}}</ref> [[Francis Bacon]] regarded as negative phenomenon the ''dissimulation'' when a man lets fall signs and arguments, that he is not, that he is [here: [[Human being]] belonging to [[humankind]] that consists of two complementary [[sex]]es — [[male]] and [[female]]{{#tag:ref|cf. [[Gedankenexperiment#Marriage vs. Homosexual Life-style]] and [[Natural order]]|group=note}}]; and called as ''simulation'' the situation when a man industriously and expressly feigns and pretends to be [here: LGBT+{{#tag:ref|cf. [[Ideomotor effect]]|group=note}}], that he is not.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.authorama.com/essays-of-francis-bacon-7.html |author=Francis Bacon |title=Essays of Francis Bacon:Of Simulation and Dissimulation |quote=There be three degrees of this hiding and veiling of a man’s self. The first, closeness, reservation, and secrecy; when a man leaveth himself without observation, or without hold to be taken, what he is. The second, dissimulation, in the negative; when a man lets fall signs and arguments, that he is not, that he is. And the third, simulation, in the affirmative; when a man industriously and expressly feigns and pretends to be, that he is not.|accessdate=9 Jul 2016}}</ref>

In his short [[satiric]] video sketch titled ''Modern Educayshun'', Neel Kolhatkar shows how policies of LGBTI Gleichschltung disguised under the label of [[Gender equality]] delve into the potential dangers of modern increasingly reactionary culture bred by social media and [[political correctness]].<ref>{{cite web |title=Modern Educayshun |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iKcWu0tsiZM&feature=youtu.be |author=Neel Kolhatkar |accessdate=6 December 2015}}</ref>

In his short [[satiric]] video sketch titled ''Modern Educayshun'', Neel Kolhatkar shows how policies of LGBTI Gleichschltung disguised under the label of [[Gender equality]] delve into the potential dangers of modern increasingly reactionary culture bred by social media and [[political correctness]].<ref>{{cite web |title=Modern Educayshun |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iKcWu0tsiZM&feature=youtu.be |author=Neel Kolhatkar |accessdate=6 December 2015}}</ref>