| Line 6: |
Line 6: |
| | | | |
| | ==2016 election== | | ==2016 election== |
| − | Two Democratic operatives left their positions after a Project Veritas video showed them discussing their involvement in the 2016 presidential campaign. One of them, Scott Foval, confessed on camera to orchestrating violence at Trump rallies, a strategy he referred to as “conflict engagement." The Wisconsin-based operative also brainstormed ideas for voter fraud with an undercover Project Veritas reporter. “We talk about a lot of things we don't talk about,” Foval said on the tape.<ref>"[https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/10/19/two-democratic-operatives-lose-jobs-after-james-okeefe-sting/ Two Democratic operatives lose jobs after James O’Keefe sting]."</ref> Foval is a contractor for Democracy Partners. Also implicated was Bob Creamer, the founder of this group. Creamer, the husband of a Democratic Congresswoman, is a felon who has visited the White House hundreds of times.<ref>[http://www.lifezette.com/polizette/democrats-could-be-prosecuted-for-trump-rally-violence/ Democrats could be prosecuted for Trump Rally Violence]"</ref> On the video, Creamer described himself as the person who "oversees" Trump rallies for the Clinton campaign.<ref>[https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/10/26/robert-creamer-james-okeefe-project-veritas-says-calls-clinton-campaign-every-morning/ Robert Creamer Says He Was on Calls With Clinton Campaign ‘Every Morning’]</ref> | + | Two Democratic operatives left their positions after a Project Veritas video showed them discussing their involvement in the 2016 presidential campaign. One of them, Scott Foval, confessed on camera to orchestrating violence at Trump rallies, a strategy he referred to as “conflict engagement." The Wisconsin-based operative also brainstormed ideas for voter fraud with an undercover Project Veritas reporter. “We talk about a lot of things we don't talk about,” Foval said on the tape.<ref>"[https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/10/19/two-democratic-operatives-lose-jobs-after-james-okeefe-sting/ Two Democratic operatives lose jobs after James O’Keefe sting]."</ref> Foval is a contractor for Democracy Partners. Also implicated was Bob Creamer, the founder of this group. Creamer, the husband of a Democratic Congresswoman, is a felon who has visited the White House hundreds of times.<ref>[https://www.lifezette.com/polizette/democrats-could-be-prosecuted-for-trump-rally-violence/ Democrats could be prosecuted for Trump Rally Violence]"</ref> On the video, Creamer described himself as the person who "oversees" Trump rallies for the Clinton campaign.<ref>[https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/10/26/robert-creamer-james-okeefe-project-veritas-says-calls-clinton-campaign-every-morning/ Robert Creamer Says He Was on Calls With Clinton Campaign ‘Every Morning’]</ref> |
| | | | |
| | == Planned Parenthood == | | == Planned Parenthood == |
| Line 26: |
Line 26: |
| | The usual [[lamestream media]] cover-up began in defense of [[liberal]] NPR. NPR claims that they knew something was fishy, “we repeatedly refused to accept.” Now O'Keefe is set to release another tape showing not only was that statement false, but NPR offered to hide the funds from showing up in their donor records.<ref>[http://biggovernment.com/publius/2011/03/10/project-veritas-npr-planned-to-accept-donation-from-muslim-brotherhood-front-group-and-hide-origins-from-government/ Project Veritas: NPR Planned to Accept Donation from Muslim Brotherhood Front Group and Hide Origins From Government, BigGovernment.com, March 10, 2011]</ref> O'Keefe did release a second video, which resulted in another NPR official being placed on leave.<ref>https://www.cnn.com/2011/POLITICS/03/11/npr.recording/index.html?hpt=Sbin</ref> | | The usual [[lamestream media]] cover-up began in defense of [[liberal]] NPR. NPR claims that they knew something was fishy, “we repeatedly refused to accept.” Now O'Keefe is set to release another tape showing not only was that statement false, but NPR offered to hide the funds from showing up in their donor records.<ref>[http://biggovernment.com/publius/2011/03/10/project-veritas-npr-planned-to-accept-donation-from-muslim-brotherhood-front-group-and-hide-origins-from-government/ Project Veritas: NPR Planned to Accept Donation from Muslim Brotherhood Front Group and Hide Origins From Government, BigGovernment.com, March 10, 2011]</ref> O'Keefe did release a second video, which resulted in another NPR official being placed on leave.<ref>https://www.cnn.com/2011/POLITICS/03/11/npr.recording/index.html?hpt=Sbin</ref> |
| | | | |
| − | Thanks to O'Keefe, calls to defund NPR in Congress just got louder. These calls were unfortunately unsuccessful. This may have been due to establish backlash against the edited videos released--[[The Blaze]], citing an interview with [[Fred Barnes]] suggested the editing was "concerning."<ref>http://www.theblaze.com/stories/does-raw-video-of-npr-expose-reveal-questionable-editing-tactics/</ref> However, both The Blaze and Fred Barnes equivocated and failed to clearly take a stand on both the outcome and the videos themselves. | + | Thanks to O'Keefe, calls to defund NPR in Congress just got louder. These calls were unfortunately unsuccessful. This may have been due to establish backlash against the edited videos released--[[The Blaze]], citing an interview with [[Fred Barnes]] suggested the editing was "concerning."<ref>https://www.theblaze.com/stories/does-raw-video-of-npr-expose-reveal-questionable-editing-tactics/</ref> However, both The Blaze and Fred Barnes equivocated and failed to clearly take a stand on both the outcome and the videos themselves. |
| | | | |
| | ==Mary Landrieu== | | ==Mary Landrieu== |
| Line 34: |
Line 34: |
| | Attempting to embarrass and undermine the credibility of [[CNN]], O'Keefe, along with fellow members of Project Veritas, staged a plan to seduce Abbie Boudreau, an investigative reporter for the network. His accomplice in the plan tipped Boudreau off before the plan was underway. O'Keefe has attempted to distance himself from the scheme.<ref>https://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20018030-503544.html</ref> | | Attempting to embarrass and undermine the credibility of [[CNN]], O'Keefe, along with fellow members of Project Veritas, staged a plan to seduce Abbie Boudreau, an investigative reporter for the network. His accomplice in the plan tipped Boudreau off before the plan was underway. O'Keefe has attempted to distance himself from the scheme.<ref>https://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20018030-503544.html</ref> |
| | ==American Federation of Teachers== | | ==American Federation of Teachers== |
| − | Project Veritas sent its agent to work undercover as an intern in the American Federation of Teachers' Michigan office. The AFT sued to enjoin Project Veritas from publishing any trade secrets or proprietary information that was taken by the agent. A federal district court judge decided not to grant a permanent injunction against publishing the information, but left Project Veritas open to a lawsuit as soon as the report is made public.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/project-veritas-james-okeefe-accuses-teachers-union-of-horrifying-attack-on-free-speech/article/2644607|title=Project Veritas' James O'Keefe accuses teachers union of 'horrifying attack on free speech'|work=Washington Examiner|date=December 29, 2017|accessdate=December 29, 2017}}</ref> | + | Project Veritas sent its agent to work undercover as an intern in the American Federation of Teachers' Michigan office. The AFT sued to enjoin Project Veritas from publishing any trade secrets or proprietary information that was taken by the agent. A federal district court judge decided not to grant a permanent injunction against publishing the information, but left Project Veritas open to a lawsuit as soon as the report is made public.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/project-veritas-james-okeefe-accuses-teachers-union-of-horrifying-attack-on-free-speech/article/2644607|title=Project Veritas' James O'Keefe accuses teachers union of 'horrifying attack on free speech'|work=Washington Examiner|date=December 29, 2017|accessdate=December 29, 2017}}</ref> |
| | | | |
| | ==See also== | | ==See also== |