Block, SkipCaptcha, apieditor, Automoderated users, Bots, edit, ratelimit-exempt
58,466
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 146:
Line 146: − +
Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia/Archive4 (view source)
Revision as of 20:17, April 3, 2019
, 20:17, April 3, 2019→Number 2: HTTP --> HTTPS, replaced: http://www.sfgate.com → https://www.sfgate.com
== Number 2 ==
== Number 2 ==
How is this bias? I found the source used for 'half the 9th graders lacked proficiency etc etc', and it pretty much supports what Wikipedia said. (http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2006/08/16/MNGE2KJB5K1.DTL)
How is this bias? I found the source used for 'half the 9th graders lacked proficiency etc etc', and it pretty much supports what Wikipedia said. (https://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2006/08/16/MNGE2KJB5K1.DTL)
The SFGate article does say that 47% of 9th graders showed proficiency on the english test; however, it also says that it improved 39% from the year before in the next sentence. Good job being 'neutral to the facts.'
The SFGate article does say that 47% of 9th graders showed proficiency on the english test; however, it also says that it improved 39% from the year before in the next sentence. Good job being 'neutral to the facts.'