Changes

[[File:JanTheRiviter 480x480.jpg|right|225px]]

[[File:JanTheRiviter 480x480.jpg|right|225px]]

[[Eric Holder]], [[Janet Napolitano]], P.J. Crowley, and other members of the [[Obama administration]] have admitted that they haven’t read the [[Arizona]] state law on [[illegal immigration]]<ref>http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2010/05/19/john-lott-arizona-immigration-law-read-obama-calderon-holder-napolitano-crowley/</ref> of which 60% - 70% of Americans support.<ref>https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/97483-poll-shows-strong-support-for-arizona-immigration-law</ref><ref>https://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2010/04/29/Poll-Most-support-Arizona-immigration-law/UPI-55921272544207/</ref> It appears that [[liberal]]s are ignorant in or have difficulty in reading the law. The purpose and goal of this article is not to give a comprehensive history of the bill, but so that everyone, especially liberals, can read and understand the bill and things related to the bill. Presented below are all of the 18 final pages of the '''Arizona Senate Bill 1070''' (also known as '''Support Our Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhoods Act''') so that liberals like the people mentioned above won’t have such a hard time reading the law. The original version can be read [http://www.foxnews.com/projects/pdf/sb1070s.pdf here] and [http://senatebill1070.com/arizona-senate-bill-1070/full-text-of-arizona-senate-bill-1070/ here], but now, the final, complete version can be read here below '''word for word'''. Liberals, you have no excuse for not reading this bill. It actually prohibits, not encourage, [[racial profiling]]. Also, as shall be seen below, Arizona’s new immigration bill is much milder than that of Mexico’s and even American immigration policy, which liberals apparently are ignorant of. All the new bill does is make Arizona law mirror federal immigration law.<ref>https://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/65340</ref> Liberals, read the new law for yourselves once and for all, please.

[[Eric Holder]], [[Janet Napolitano]], P.J. Crowley, and other members of the [[Obama administration]] have admitted that they haven’t read the [[Arizona]] state law on [[illegal immigration]]<ref>https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2010/05/19/john-lott-arizona-immigration-law-read-obama-calderon-holder-napolitano-crowley/</ref> of which 60% - 70% of Americans support.<ref>https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/97483-poll-shows-strong-support-for-arizona-immigration-law</ref><ref>https://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2010/04/29/Poll-Most-support-Arizona-immigration-law/UPI-55921272544207/</ref> It appears that [[liberal]]s are ignorant in or have difficulty in reading the law. The purpose and goal of this article is not to give a comprehensive history of the bill, but so that everyone, especially liberals, can read and understand the bill and things related to the bill. Presented below are all of the 18 final pages of the '''Arizona Senate Bill 1070''' (also known as '''Support Our Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhoods Act''') so that liberals like the people mentioned above won’t have such a hard time reading the law. The original version can be read [https://www.foxnews.com/projects/pdf/sb1070s.pdf here] and [http://senatebill1070.com/arizona-senate-bill-1070/full-text-of-arizona-senate-bill-1070/ here], but now, the final, complete version can be read here below '''word for word'''. Liberals, you have no excuse for not reading this bill. It actually prohibits, not encourage, [[racial profiling]]. Also, as shall be seen below, Arizona’s new immigration bill is much milder than that of Mexico’s and even American immigration policy, which liberals apparently are ignorant of. All the new bill does is make Arizona law mirror federal immigration law.<ref>https://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/65340</ref> Liberals, read the new law for yourselves once and for all, please.

Notes: The CAPITALIZED text is amendments of the original bill. The ''italicized'' text denotes changes made

Notes: The CAPITALIZED text is amendments of the original bill. The ''italicized'' text denotes changes made

On April 23, 2010, Senate Bill 1070 (sponsored by Senator Russell Pearce) was signed into law. SB1070 was enacted as Laws 2010, Chapter 113. House Bill 2162 made additional changes to Laws 2010. Below is an engrossed version of

On April 23, 2010, Senate Bill 1070 (sponsored by Senator Russell Pearce) was signed into law. SB1070 was enacted as Laws 2010, Chapter 113. House Bill 2162 made additional changes to Laws 2010. Below is an engrossed version of

SB1070 with the pertinent changes made by the Conference Engrossed HB2162.<ref>http://www.azleg.gov/alispdfs/council/SB1070-HB2162.PDF.</ref><ref>http://www.foxnews.com/projects/pdf/SB1070-HB2162New.PDF</ref>

SB1070 with the pertinent changes made by the Conference Engrossed HB2162.<ref>http://www.azleg.gov/alispdfs/council/SB1070-HB2162.PDF.</ref><ref>https://www.foxnews.com/projects/pdf/SB1070-HB2162New.PDF</ref>

==The contents of Arizona Senate Bill 1070==

==The contents of Arizona Senate Bill 1070==

Which means many illegal aliens who are otherwise innocent of a crime might be subject to indefinite detention – a violation of due process.  

Which means many illegal aliens who are otherwise innocent of a crime might be subject to indefinite detention – a violation of due process.  

Finally, and perhaps most ominously, state and local jails are not being given the option to participate in Secure Communities. The Department of Homeland Security considers their involvement mandatory. San Francisco, in fact, recently tried to “opt out” of the program, citing civil rights concerns. But California attorney general Jerry Brown, facing a climate of anti-immigrant sentiment, rebuffed that effort.

Finally, and perhaps most ominously, state and local jails are not being given the option to participate in Secure Communities. The Department of Homeland Security considers their involvement mandatory. San Francisco, in fact, recently tried to “opt out” of the program, citing civil rights concerns. But California attorney general Jerry Brown, facing a climate of anti-immigrant sentiment, rebuffed that effort.

In fact, largely out of public view, the White House has been fast-tracking Secure Communities. The program is currently operational in 169 jurisdictions, in 20 states, including Arizona. That makes the Obama administration’s criticism of Arizona’s new enforcement law seem all the more ironic.<ref>http://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/Opinion/2010/0610/If-the-Arizona-immigration-law-is-misguided-so-is-Obama-s-criminal-alien-roundup-program</ref>

In fact, largely out of public view, the White House has been fast-tracking Secure Communities. The program is currently operational in 169 jurisdictions, in 20 states, including Arizona. That makes the Obama administration’s criticism of Arizona’s new enforcement law seem all the more ironic.<ref>https://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/Opinion/2010/0610/If-the-Arizona-immigration-law-is-misguided-so-is-Obama-s-criminal-alien-roundup-program</ref>

== Other States' immigration policies vs. Arizona Senate Bill 1070 ==

== Other States' immigration policies vs. Arizona Senate Bill 1070 ==