| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | [[File:Safarti3.jpg|alt=evolutionary theory opponent|thumb|200px|right|The [[Creation science|creation scientist]] [[Jonathan Sarfati]], who was a New Zealand chess master, is able to play [[chess]] against multiple players blindfolded and he remains undefeated in these types of chess matches.<ref>[http://creation.com/an-awesome-mind-creation-magazine-jonathan-sarfati-interview Jonathon Sarfati interview]</ref> ]] | + | [[File:Safarti3.jpg|alt=evolutionary theory opponent|thumb|200px|right|The [[Creation science|creation scientist]] [[Jonathan Sarfati]], who was a New Zealand chess master, is able to play [[chess]] against multiple players blindfolded and he remains undefeated in these types of chess matches.<ref>[https://creation.com/an-awesome-mind-creation-magazine-jonathan-sarfati-interview Jonathon Sarfati interview]</ref> ]] |
| | [[Howard Gardner]] at [[Harvard University]] has identified various distinct intelligences: interpersonal, intrapersonal, visual–spatial, verbal–linguistic, logical–mathematical, musical–rhythmic, bodily–kinesthetic, and naturalistic.<ref>[http://www.tecweb.org/styles/gardner.html Multiple Ingelligence]</ref> See: [[Theory of multiple intelligences]] and [[Atheism and the theory of multiple intelligences]] | | [[Howard Gardner]] at [[Harvard University]] has identified various distinct intelligences: interpersonal, intrapersonal, visual–spatial, verbal–linguistic, logical–mathematical, musical–rhythmic, bodily–kinesthetic, and naturalistic.<ref>[http://www.tecweb.org/styles/gardner.html Multiple Ingelligence]</ref> See: [[Theory of multiple intelligences]] and [[Atheism and the theory of multiple intelligences]] |
| | | | |
| Line 12: |
Line 12: |
| | Given that atheists/evolutionists actively discriminate against creationist and religious conservatives in academia and other places, atheists pointing out a higher prevalence of atheists relative to their numbers belonging to high-profile scientific organizations or being awarded various distinctions is disingenuous (see: [[Suppression of alternatives to evolution]] and [[Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed]]).<ref> | | Given that atheists/evolutionists actively discriminate against creationist and religious conservatives in academia and other places, atheists pointing out a higher prevalence of atheists relative to their numbers belonging to high-profile scientific organizations or being awarded various distinctions is disingenuous (see: [[Suppression of alternatives to evolution]] and [[Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed]]).<ref> |
| | *[http://usstore.creation.com/catalog/slaughter-dissidents-p-963.html?osCsid=r7q42h4vvqrfp5ob05tnco37r3 Slaughter of the dissidents] | | *[http://usstore.creation.com/catalog/slaughter-dissidents-p-963.html?osCsid=r7q42h4vvqrfp5ob05tnco37r3 Slaughter of the dissidents] |
| − | *[http://townhall.com/columnists/rachelalexander/2013/06/10/suspicions-confirmed-academia-shutting-out-conservative-professors-n1616406/page/full Suspicions confirmed, conservatives being shut out of academia] | + | *[https://townhall.com/columnists/rachelalexander/2013/06/10/suspicions-confirmed-academia-shutting-out-conservative-professors-n1616406/page/full Suspicions confirmed, conservatives being shut out of academia] |
| − | *[http://creation.com/refuting-evolution-chapter-1-evolution-creation-science-religion-facts-bias Refuting Evolution Evolution & creation, science & religion, facts & bias, First published in Refuting Evolution, Chapter 1] | + | *[https://creation.com/refuting-evolution-chapter-1-evolution-creation-science-religion-facts-bias Refuting Evolution Evolution & creation, science & religion, facts & bias, First published in Refuting Evolution, Chapter 1] |
| − | *[http://creation.com/the-not-so-nobel-decision-raymond-damadian-mri The not-so-Nobel decision] | + | *[https://creation.com/the-not-so-nobel-decision-raymond-damadian-mri The not-so-Nobel decision] |
| − | *[http://creation.com/dr-damadians-vital-contribution-to-mri-nobel-prize-controversy-returns Dr Damadian’s vital contribution to MRI: Nobel prize controversy returns]</ref> | + | *[https://creation.com/dr-damadians-vital-contribution-to-mri-nobel-prize-controversy-returns Dr Damadian’s vital contribution to MRI: Nobel prize controversy returns]</ref> |
| | | | |
| | For more information, please see: [[Atheism and the suppression of science]] | | For more information, please see: [[Atheism and the suppression of science]] |
| Line 21: |
Line 21: |
| | == Atheism and pseuodoscientific and pagan ideologies == | | == Atheism and pseuodoscientific and pagan ideologies == |
| | | | |
| − | In addition, there is a significant segment of atheists who engage in the erroneous ideologies/worldviews of [[scientism]], nature worship and neo-paganism so a certain degree of preoccupation/obsession with [[pseudoscience]], [[Naturalism (philosophy)|naturalistic philosophy]] and scientific endeavors is not surprising within some members of the atheist community.<ref>[http://creation.com/atheism#atheism-neopaganism Atheism as nature worship or neo-paganism]</ref> See also: [[Irreligion and superstition]] and [[Evolution as a secular origins myth]] and [[Evolution and Cases of Fraud, Hoaxes and Speculation]] | + | In addition, there is a significant segment of atheists who engage in the erroneous ideologies/worldviews of [[scientism]], nature worship and neo-paganism so a certain degree of preoccupation/obsession with [[pseudoscience]], [[Naturalism (philosophy)|naturalistic philosophy]] and scientific endeavors is not surprising within some members of the atheist community.<ref>[https://creation.com/atheism#atheism-neopaganism Atheism as nature worship or neo-paganism]</ref> See also: [[Irreligion and superstition]] and [[Evolution as a secular origins myth]] and [[Evolution and Cases of Fraud, Hoaxes and Speculation]] |
| | | | |
| | == Secular scientific community and their grasp of logic, statistics and history/philosophy of science == | | == Secular scientific community and their grasp of logic, statistics and history/philosophy of science == |
| Line 31: |
Line 31: |
| | *[http://voxday.blogspot.com/2008/01/atheist-morality-and-iq-in-action.html TIA review aka Atheism in Action] | | *[http://voxday.blogspot.com/2008/01/atheist-morality-and-iq-in-action.html TIA review aka Atheism in Action] |
| | *[http://voxday.blogspot.com/2011/07/its-not-all-nails.html It's not all nails] | | *[http://voxday.blogspot.com/2011/07/its-not-all-nails.html It's not all nails] |
| − | *[http://voxday.blogspot.ca/2014/02/statistical-misleadings.html Statistical misleadings]</ref> Moreover, due to the poor ethics of many atheist/secular scientists, scientific fraud has become a significant problem within the scientific community.<ref>[http://creation.com/science-fraud-epidemic Why the epidemic of fraud exists in science today] by Jerry Bergman</ref> See also: [[Atheism and morality]] and [[Atheist population and immorality]] | + | *[http://voxday.blogspot.ca/2014/02/statistical-misleadings.html Statistical misleadings]</ref> Moreover, due to the poor ethics of many atheist/secular scientists, scientific fraud has become a significant problem within the scientific community.<ref>[https://creation.com/science-fraud-epidemic Why the epidemic of fraud exists in science today] by Jerry Bergman</ref> See also: [[Atheism and morality]] and [[Atheist population and immorality]] |
| | == Atheism, scientism and the limitations of science == | | == Atheism, scientism and the limitations of science == |
| | | | |