53
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 267:
Line 267: + +
no edit summary
:I have been thinking that maybe some of the stuff in this article could be removed to one or more separate articles (with a brief summary of their points remaining here).
:I have been thinking that maybe some of the stuff in this article could be removed to one or more separate articles (with a brief summary of their points remaining here).
:[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 09:18, 6 May 2007 (EDT)
:[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 09:18, 6 May 2007 (EDT)
While I wouldn't be so bold as to edit the personal sandbox of certain sysops here, I can't help but point out that the statement: "They use overwhelming archaeological, fossil, and documentary evidence to argue that dinosaurs co-existed with mankind until at least relatively recent times. " is incredibly biased towards creationism. Use of the word "overwhelming" when describing the evidence of human-dinosaur co-existence is at best an overstatement, at worst an outright lie. Perhaps one of the Favored-Ones who hold some pretense of semi-neutrality might consider removing the word overwhelming? [[User:QNA|QNA]] 11:53, 9 May 2007 (EDT)