In 2004, Professor Taylor co-authored a paper reviewing new data from this binary pulsar. By this time the data diverged from the predictions of the [[Theory of General Relativity]], and a "galactic acceleration term" was introduced to fit the data to the theory. However, a perfect fit was not possible for any set of assumptions for the physical attributes of the system, and a minimum of 0.2% in error was introduced. If the theory were correct, there should be no error because assumptions are made about the physical attributes in order to fit the data to the theory. | In 2004, Professor Taylor co-authored a paper reviewing new data from this binary pulsar. By this time the data diverged from the predictions of the [[Theory of General Relativity]], and a "galactic acceleration term" was introduced to fit the data to the theory. However, a perfect fit was not possible for any set of assumptions for the physical attributes of the system, and a minimum of 0.2% in error was introduced. If the theory were correct, there should be no error because assumptions are made about the physical attributes in order to fit the data to the theory. |