Block, SkipCaptcha, apieditor, Automoderated users, Bots, edit, ratelimit-exempt
58,183
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 30:
Line 30: − +
→Abuses by the IPCC: HTTP --> HTTPS #3, replaced: http://www.forbes.com → https://www.forbes.com
:[[Hendrik Tennekes]] wrote: 'The IPCC review process is fatally flawed....' [http://www.grassrootinstitute.org/system/old/GrassrootPerspective/HockeyStickScandal.shtml]
:[[Hendrik Tennekes]] wrote: 'The IPCC review process is fatally flawed....' [http://www.grassrootinstitute.org/system/old/GrassrootPerspective/HockeyStickScandal.shtml]
:There can be no peer review at all when authors refuse to release their data and computer codes for public inspection and attempted reconstruction of reported results by other scientists. [http://www.forbes.com/sites/peterferrara/2013/04/28/the-disgraceful-episode-of-lysenkoism-brings-us-global-warming-theory/#546f631241e4]
:There can be no peer review at all when authors refuse to release their data and computer codes for public inspection and attempted reconstruction of reported results by other scientists. [https://www.forbes.com/sites/peterferrara/2013/04/28/the-disgraceful-episode-of-lysenkoism-brings-us-global-warming-theory/#546f631241e4]
==Limitations of peer review==
==Limitations of peer review==