Changes

4 bytes added , 23:54, April 9, 2019

m

HTTP --> HTTPS #3, replaced: http://www.pbs.org → https://www.pbs.org (4)

Line 146: Line 146:

</tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 7:</td>

−

<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background: #eee; color:black; font-size: smaller;"><div>For more than a century, the claim that '''E=mc<sup>2</sup>''' has never yielded anything of value.  Often it seems to be used as a redefinition of "[[energy]]" for pseudo-scientific purposes, as by the [[lamestream media]]. The equation has been used as a possible explanation for process involved in [[nuclear power]] generation and [[nuclear weapon]]s, and in the study of [[antimatter]].<ref>Tyson, Peter. "The Legacy of E=mc<sup>2</sup>." October 11, 2005. PBS ''NOVA''. ~~http~~://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/physics/legacy-of-e-equals-mc2.html</ref></div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background: #eee; color:black; font-size: smaller;"><div>For more than a century, the claim that '''E=mc<sup>2</sup>''' has never yielded anything of value.  Often it seems to be used as a redefinition of "[[energy]]" for pseudo-scientific purposes, as by the [[lamestream media]]. The equation has been used as a possible explanation for process involved in [[nuclear power]] generation and [[nuclear weapon]]s, and in the study of [[antimatter]].<ref>Tyson, Peter. "The Legacy of E=mc<sup>2</sup>." October 11, 2005. PBS ''NOVA''. ~~http~~://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/physics/legacy-of-e-equals-mc2.html</ref></div></td></tr>

+

<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background: #eee; color:black; font-size: smaller;"><div>For more than a century, the claim that '''E=mc<sup>2</sup>''' has never yielded anything of value.  Often it seems to be used as a redefinition of "[[energy]]" for pseudo-scientific purposes, as by the [[lamestream media]]. The equation has been used as a possible explanation for process involved in [[nuclear power]] generation and [[nuclear weapon]]s, and in the study of [[antimatter]].<ref>Tyson, Peter. "The Legacy of E=mc<sup>2</sup>." October 11, 2005. PBS ''NOVA''. https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/physics/legacy-of-e-equals-mc2.html</ref></div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background: #eee; color:black; font-size: smaller;"><div>For more than a century, the claim that '''E=mc<sup>2</sup>''' has never yielded anything of value.  Often it seems to be used as a redefinition of "[[energy]]" for pseudo-scientific purposes, as by the [[lamestream media]]. The equation has been used as a possible explanation for process involved in [[nuclear power]] generation and [[nuclear weapon]]s, and in the study of [[antimatter]].<ref>Tyson, Peter. "The Legacy of E=mc<sup>2</sup>." October 11, 2005. PBS ''NOVA''. https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/physics/legacy-of-e-equals-mc2.html</ref></div></td></tr>

<tr><td class='diff-marker'>-</td><td style="background: #ffa; color:black; font-size: smaller;"><div>The [[Theory of Relativity]] has never been able to derive '''E=mc<sup>2</sup>''', and a physicist observed in a peer-reviewed paper published in 2011 that "a rigorous proof of the mass-energy equivalence is probably beyond the purview of the special theory."<ref>http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011AmJPh..79..591H</ref></div></td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="background: #cfc; color:black; font-size: smaller;"><div>The [[Theory of Relativity]] has never been able to derive '''E=mc<sup>2</sup>''', and a physicist observed in a peer-reviewed paper published in 2011 that "a rigorous proof of the mass-energy equivalence is probably beyond the purview of the special theory<ins class="diffchange diffchange-inline">," even though "it continues to be affirmed experimentally</ins>."<ref>http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011AmJPh..79..591H</ref></div></td></tr>

Line 241: Line 241:

</tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 7:</td>

−

<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background: #eee; color:black; font-size: smaller;"><div>For more than a century, the claim that '''E=mc<sup>2</sup>''' has never yielded anything of value.  Often it seems to be used as a redefinition of "[[energy]]" for pseudo-scientific purposes, as by the [[lamestream media]]. The equation has been used as a possible explanation for process involved in [[nuclear power]] generation and [[nuclear weapon]]s, and in the study of [[antimatter]].<ref>Tyson, Peter. "The Legacy of E=mc<sup>2</sup>." October 11, 2005. PBS ''NOVA''. ~~http~~://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/physics/legacy-of-e-equals-mc2.html</ref></div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background: #eee; color:black; font-size: smaller;"><div>For more than a century, the claim that '''E=mc<sup>2</sup>''' has never yielded anything of value.  Often it seems to be used as a redefinition of "[[energy]]" for pseudo-scientific purposes, as by the [[lamestream media]]. The equation has been used as a possible explanation for process involved in [[nuclear power]] generation and [[nuclear weapon]]s, and in the study of [[antimatter]].<ref>Tyson, Peter. "The Legacy of E=mc<sup>2</sup>." October 11, 2005. PBS ''NOVA''. ~~http~~://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/physics/legacy-of-e-equals-mc2.html</ref></div></td></tr>

+

<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background: #eee; color:black; font-size: smaller;"><div>For more than a century, the claim that '''E=mc<sup>2</sup>''' has never yielded anything of value.  Often it seems to be used as a redefinition of "[[energy]]" for pseudo-scientific purposes, as by the [[lamestream media]]. The equation has been used as a possible explanation for process involved in [[nuclear power]] generation and [[nuclear weapon]]s, and in the study of [[antimatter]].<ref>Tyson, Peter. "The Legacy of E=mc<sup>2</sup>." October 11, 2005. PBS ''NOVA''. https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/physics/legacy-of-e-equals-mc2.html</ref></div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background: #eee; color:black; font-size: smaller;"><div>For more than a century, the claim that '''E=mc<sup>2</sup>''' has never yielded anything of value.  Often it seems to be used as a redefinition of "[[energy]]" for pseudo-scientific purposes, as by the [[lamestream media]]. The equation has been used as a possible explanation for process involved in [[nuclear power]] generation and [[nuclear weapon]]s, and in the study of [[antimatter]].<ref>Tyson, Peter. "The Legacy of E=mc<sup>2</sup>." October 11, 2005. PBS ''NOVA''. https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/physics/legacy-of-e-equals-mc2.html</ref></div></td></tr>

<tr><td class='diff-marker'>-</td><td style="background: #ffa; color:black; font-size: smaller;"><div>The [[Theory of Relativity]] has never been able to derive '''E=mc<sup>2</sup>''', and a physicist observed in a peer-reviewed paper published in 2011 that "a rigorous proof of the mass-energy equivalence is probably beyond the purview of the special theory."<ref>http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011AmJPh..79..591H</ref></div></td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="background: #cfc; color:black; font-size: smaller;"><div>The [[Theory of Relativity]] has never been able to derive '''E=mc<sup>2</sup>''', and a physicist observed in a peer-reviewed paper published in 2011 that "a rigorous proof of the mass-energy equivalence is probably beyond the purview of the special theory<ins class="diffchange diffchange-inline">," even though "it continues to be affirmed experimentally</ins>."<ref>http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011AmJPh..79..591H</ref></div></td></tr>

DavidB4-bot

Block, SkipCaptcha, apieditor, Automoderated users, Bots, edit, ratelimit-exempt

58,426

edits

Changes

User:GregG/RSS 5 (view source)

Revision as of 23:54, April 9, 2019

Navigation menu

Search