Changes

==Criticism==

==Criticism==

Neil Seeman, the director of the Canadian Statistical Assessment Service, said May 3, 2003, "Just because a study or pronouncement carries the imprimatur of the WHO should not mean it is sacrosanct," about the WHO.<ref>http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/comment-seeman050103.asp WHO Says What?</ref> Philip Stevens wrote in December 2005, "[t]he World Health Organization is increasingly working against American values and the interests of the poor, [and] the U.S. should seriously consider cutting back the funds until the WHO adopts a more practical outlook."<ref>http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/stevens200512020821.asp WHO’s in Charge?</ref>

Neil Seeman, the director of the Canadian Statistical Assessment Service, said May 3, 2003, "Just because a study or pronouncement carries the imprimatur of the WHO should not mean it is sacrosanct," about the WHO.<ref>https://www.nationalreview.com/comment/comment-seeman050103.asp WHO Says What?</ref> Philip Stevens wrote in December 2005, "[t]he World Health Organization is increasingly working against American values and the interests of the poor, [and] the U.S. should seriously consider cutting back the funds until the WHO adopts a more practical outlook."<ref>https://www.nationalreview.com/comment/stevens200512020821.asp WHO’s in Charge?</ref>

==External links==

==External links==