Block, SkipCaptcha, apieditor, Automoderated users, Bots, edit, ratelimit-exempt
59,485
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 2:
Line 2: − http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/story?id=3341576+
Debate:How should we view the fact leading scientists do not believe in God? (view source)
Revision as of 12:59, April 10, 2019
, 12:59, April 10, 2019→top: HTTP --> HTTPS #3, replaced: http://abcnews.go.com → https://abcnews.go.com
With the leading scientists of America (I believe the British numbers are even higher), professing non-belief to a huge majority. And masses of scientists from leading universities of America having a massively increased chance of being agnostic/atheistic, what lessons should we take from the fact that the supposedly best educated (and most likely highly intelligent also), have decided that god either doesn't exist, or at the least has no positive evidence? http://www.stephenjaygould.org/ctrl/news/file002.html
With the leading scientists of America (I believe the British numbers are even higher), professing non-belief to a huge majority. And masses of scientists from leading universities of America having a massively increased chance of being agnostic/atheistic, what lessons should we take from the fact that the supposedly best educated (and most likely highly intelligent also), have decided that god either doesn't exist, or at the least has no positive evidence? http://www.stephenjaygould.org/ctrl/news/file002.html
https://abcnews.go.com/Technology/story?id=3341576
Perhaps one thing could be a feeling of pressure from other scientists to disclaim god? However personally I don't think that this could fully explain these results to any degree. [[User:Raggs|Raggs]] 06:30, 28 February 2008 (EST)
Perhaps one thing could be a feeling of pressure from other scientists to disclaim god? However personally I don't think that this could fully explain these results to any degree. [[User:Raggs|Raggs]] 06:30, 28 February 2008 (EST)