SkipCaptcha
510
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 923:
Line 923: + + +
→You should face reality and accept there is more than one editor who uses the User: Conservative account
::::Second, if the owner of Conservapedia decides to bequeath control of Conservapedia in his waning years, unlike Conservapedia editors whose accounts will remain inactive after they meet their Maker, the Conservapedia account I created will live on. "Old soldiers never die, they simply fade away".[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 12:47, 8 April 2019 (EDT)
::::Second, if the owner of Conservapedia decides to bequeath control of Conservapedia in his waning years, unlike Conservapedia editors whose accounts will remain inactive after they meet their Maker, the Conservapedia account I created will live on. "Old soldiers never die, they simply fade away".[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 12:47, 8 April 2019 (EDT)
SamHB, I enabled other editors to use the User: Conservative account for these reasons: 1) [[Sun Tzu]] is considered by many as one of the greatest strategist/tacticians of all history. He said to be mysterious for various reasons. What could be more mysterious than multiple anonymous editors? 2) After TK passed away, his influence at this website obviously went down (I was never a fan of TK). It occurred to me that if a prominent editor has a "succession plan" in relation to his/her account, it would be a better thing for multiple reasons. 3) The amusement factor. Frankly, it is amusing to see people rail at the User: Conservative and construct armchair psychological analysis of the account when the fact is that the account has multiple editors which makes their foolish strategy of personal attacks rather impotent. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 05:54, 10 April 2019 (EDT)
SamHB, I enabled other editors to use the User: Conservative account for these reasons: 1) [[Sun Tzu]] is considered by many as one of the greatest strategist/tacticians of all history. He said to be mysterious for various reasons. What could be more mysterious than multiple anonymous editors? 2) After TK passed away, his influence at this website obviously went down (I was never a fan of TK). It occurred to me that if a prominent editor has a "succession plan" in relation to his/her account, it would be a better thing for multiple reasons. 3) The amusement factor. Frankly, it is amusing to see people rail at the User: Conservative and construct armchair psychological analysis of the account when the fact is that the account has multiple editors which makes their foolish strategy of personal attacks rather impotent. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 05:54, 10 April 2019 (EDT)
:Let it go, man. Your real life identity is well known, and your writing / argumentation style is unmistakable. Hyraxes chewing the cud, etc. No amount of dissembling is going to change this.
:FFIW, though, your general sentence construction has improved considerably over the past few years. There's less repetition and far fewer redundant phrases than there used to be. Good work (seriously). [[User:JohnZ|JohnZ]] ([[User talk:JohnZ|talk]]) 17:14, 10 April 2019 (EDT)