Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 67: Line 67:  
*[http://sspx.org/en/about/founder Founder Archbishop Marcel Lefabvre]
 
*[http://sspx.org/en/about/founder Founder Archbishop Marcel Lefabvre]
 
*[http://sspx.org/en/about/mission Mission Unrestrained gift of self]
 
*[http://sspx.org/en/about/mission Mission Unrestrained gift of self]
−
</ref> Some traditionalist writers constantly assert that their own traditional English version of a '''''medieval''''' thirteenth century manuscript of the Bible, which differs from the scholarly reading of the earliest Bible texts in the original languages from the eighth century or earlier, ''only demonstrates more clearly to them that '''modern''' Biblical textual historians and scholars have falsified and corrupted the '''''original''''' text of the Bible by their translations of the earliest ancient manuscripts.'' In other words, they unhesitatingly maintain, without evidence, that their own later traditional English version from a medieval manuscript, which they have always believed is true, is far more faithfully and accurately the true word of God than any of the more recently uncovered earlier and earliest extant manuscripts of the Bible discovered to date. When the medieval manuscript is shown to differ from the more ancient manuscript the traditionalist regards the more ancient manuscript as less reliable and the more recent medieval manuscript as more accurate, and regards the most recent textual scholarly findings as attempts to falsify the word of God. See for example, [http://www.kotipetripaavola.com/Biblemanuscripts.html '''The Bible manuscripts''' (kotipetripaavola.com)]
+
</ref> Some traditionalist writers constantly assert that their own traditional English version of a '''''medieval''''' thirteenth century manuscript of the Bible, which differs from the scholarly reading of the earliest Bible texts in the original languages from the eighth century or earlier, ''only demonstrates more clearly to them that '''modern''' Biblical textual historians and scholars have falsified and corrupted the '''''original''''' text of the Bible by their translations of the earliest ancient manuscripts.'' In other words, they unhesitatingly maintain, without evidence, that their own later traditional English version from a medieval manuscript, which they have always believed is true, is far more faithfully and accurately the true word of God than any of the more recently uncovered earlier and earliest extant manuscripts of the Bible discovered to date. When the medieval manuscript is shown to differ from the more ancient manuscript the traditionalist regards the more ancient manuscript as less reliable and the more recent medieval manuscript as more accurate, and regards the most recent textual scholarly findings as attempts to falsify the word of God. See for example, [http://www.kotipetripaavola.com/Biblemanuscripts.html '''The Bible manuscripts''' (kotipetripaavola.com)]. See also [[Textus Receptus]].
    
===The Canon===
 
===The Canon===
Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, edit, move, protect
30,891

edits

Navigation menu