Changes

* The "public editor" of the New York Times accused his employers of harboring progressive bias on topics like [[gay marriage]] and the [[occupy movement]].<ref>[https://www.politico.com/blogs/media/2012/08/ny-times-public-editor-progressive-worldview-bleeds-133188.html]</ref> Former editor Jill Abramson admitted the paper had an "unmistakably [[anti-Trump]]" bias.<ref>Kurz, Howard (January 2, 2019). [https://www.foxnews.com/politics/former-n-y-times-editor-rips-trump-coverage-as-biased Former NY Times editor rips Trump coverage as biased]. ''Fox News''. Retrieved January 3, 2019.</ref><ref>Mass, Warren (January 3, 2019). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/item/31088-former-top-editor-jill-abramson-notes-anti-trump-bias-at-new-york-times Former Top Editor Jill Abramson Notes Anti-Trump Bias at New York Times]. ''The New American''. Retrieved January 3, 2019.</ref>

* The "public editor" of the New York Times accused his employers of harboring progressive bias on topics like [[gay marriage]] and the [[occupy movement]].<ref>[https://www.politico.com/blogs/media/2012/08/ny-times-public-editor-progressive-worldview-bleeds-133188.html]</ref> Former editor Jill Abramson admitted the paper had an "unmistakably [[anti-Trump]]" bias.<ref>Kurz, Howard (January 2, 2019). [https://www.foxnews.com/politics/former-n-y-times-editor-rips-trump-coverage-as-biased Former NY Times editor rips Trump coverage as biased]. ''Fox News''. Retrieved January 3, 2019.</ref><ref>Mass, Warren (January 3, 2019). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/item/31088-former-top-editor-jill-abramson-notes-anti-trump-bias-at-new-york-times Former Top Editor Jill Abramson Notes Anti-Trump Bias at New York Times]. ''The New American''. Retrieved January 3, 2019.</ref>

Its publisher, Arthur Ochs Sulzberger, Jr. has denied this, claiming instead that the paper has an "urban" viewpoint.<ref>https://www.nytimes.com/2004/07/25/weekinreview/25bott.html?ei=5088&en=452926dcb11511a3&ex=1248667200&pagewanted=all&position=</ref>  However, in the summer of 2004, the newspaper's then public editor (ombudsman), Daniel Okrent, published a piece on the ''Times''' liberal bias, citing the example of its coverage of [[Homosexuality and Marriage|homosexual marriage]].<ref>https://www.nytimes.com/2004/07/25/weekinreview/25bott.html?ei=5088&en=452926dcb11511a3&ex=1248667200&pagewanted=all&position=</ref>

Its publisher, Arthur Ochs Sulzberger, Jr. has denied this, claiming instead that the paper has an "urban" viewpoint.<ref>https://www.nytimes.com/2004/07/25/weekinreview/25bott.html?ei=5088&en=452926dcb11511a3&ex=1248667200&pagewanted=all&position=</ref>  However, in the summer of 2004, the newspaper's then public editor (ombudsman), Daniel Okrent, published a piece on the ''Times''' liberal bias, citing the example of its coverage of [[Homosexuality and Marriage|homosexual marriage]].<ref>https://www.nytimes.com/2004/07/25/weekinreview/25bott.html?ei=5088&en=452926dcb11511a3&ex=1248667200&pagewanted=all&position=</ref> The paper is noted for its frequent inaccurate statements related to Christian and Catholic beliefs and practices.<ref>Hemingway, Mark (April 19, 2019). [https://nypost.com/2019/04/19/new-york-times-hits-new-low-with-mortifying-notre-dame-correction/ New York Times hits new low with mortifying Notre Dame correction]. ''New York Post''. Retrieved April 22, 2019.</ref>

__TOC__

__TOC__