Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 4: Line 4:     
I would have to say YEC.  Most of the science articles have a YEC POV at the bottom.  If Conservapedia was representing the conservative POV then you would not see YEC POVS for everything without seeing some other conservative POV.
 
I would have to say YEC.  Most of the science articles have a YEC POV at the bottom.  If Conservapedia was representing the conservative POV then you would not see YEC POVS for everything without seeing some other conservative POV.
 +
 +
: This just all goes back to the problem of using terms like conservative and liberal as blanket terms.  Obviously not all conservatives are YEC, but the adminstration of this site appears to believe the word conservative encompasses certain beliefs and there is no grey areas.  And I imagine in doing so they will alienate a good chunk of the population who consider themselves conservative.
 +
 +
:But the fact of the matter is, it's their site, they can call it what they want and run it how they want.  People can get on here and post all they want about how it's not fair and balanced, how it is irresponsible, etc, but it isn't going to make a lick of difference for how this site is managed no matter how valid the complaints are.  The only real way to effect any kind of change on a site like this is if you are conservative, but bothered by the rampant YEC articles, or whatever, is to just state how this doesn't match your personal ideologies and and walk away.  I believe the atmosphere is too unstable to actually convert someone, and the end result will be like-minded people running a wiki for like-minded folks, and there is nothing wrong with that.  --[[User:Colest|Colest]] 16:03, 9 May 2007 (EDT)
1,148

edits

Navigation menu