| | In January 2019, ''The New York Times'' wrote a sympathetic profile of [[Black Hebrew Israelites]], a hate group, treating them significantly better than a group of Catholic students wearing [[MAGA]] hats, who it demonized.<ref>Adams, Becket (January 24, 2019). [https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/new-york-times-gives-friendlier-coverage-to-actual-hate-group-than-maga-teens New York Times gives friendlier coverage to actual hate group than 'MAGA'-teens]. ''Washington Examiner''. Retrieved January 24, 2019.</ref><ref>Nolte, John (January 24, 2019). [https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/01/24/new-york-times-blistered-for-sympathetic-portrait-of-black-nationalists-who-taunted-covington-kids/ New York Times Blistered for Sympathetic Portrait of Black Nationalists Who Taunted Covington Kids]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved January 24, 2019.</ref> | | In January 2019, ''The New York Times'' wrote a sympathetic profile of [[Black Hebrew Israelites]], a hate group, treating them significantly better than a group of Catholic students wearing [[MAGA]] hats, who it demonized.<ref>Adams, Becket (January 24, 2019). [https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/new-york-times-gives-friendlier-coverage-to-actual-hate-group-than-maga-teens New York Times gives friendlier coverage to actual hate group than 'MAGA'-teens]. ''Washington Examiner''. Retrieved January 24, 2019.</ref><ref>Nolte, John (January 24, 2019). [https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/01/24/new-york-times-blistered-for-sympathetic-portrait-of-black-nationalists-who-taunted-covington-kids/ New York Times Blistered for Sympathetic Portrait of Black Nationalists Who Taunted Covington Kids]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved January 24, 2019.</ref> |
| | In 2004, the newspaper's ombudsman, Daniel Okrent, published a piece on the ''Times''' liberal bias, citing the example of its coverage of [[Homosexuality and Marriage|homosexual marriage]].<ref>https://www.nytimes.com/2004/07/25/weekinreview/25bott.html?ei=5088&en=452926dcb11511a3&ex=1248667200&pagewanted=all&position=</ref> | | In 2004, the newspaper's ombudsman, Daniel Okrent, published a piece on the ''Times''' liberal bias, citing the example of its coverage of [[Homosexuality and Marriage|homosexual marriage]].<ref>https://www.nytimes.com/2004/07/25/weekinreview/25bott.html?ei=5088&en=452926dcb11511a3&ex=1248667200&pagewanted=all&position=</ref> |
| − | In 2012 again the "public editor" of the New York Times, Arthur Brisbane, accused his employers of harboring progressive bias on topics like [[gay marriage]] and the [[occupy movement]].<ref>[https://www.politico.com/blogs/media/2012/08/ny-times-public-editor-progressive-worldview-bleeds-133188.html]</ref> Its publisher, Arthur Ochs Sulzberger, Jr. has denied the papers extreme left bias, claiming instead that the paper has an "urban" viewpoint.<ref>https://www.nytimes.com/2004/07/25/weekinreview/25bott.html?ei=5088&en=452926dcb11511a3&ex=1248667200&pagewanted=all&position=</ref> | + | In 2012 again the "public editor" of the New York Times, Arthur Brisbane, accused his employers of harboring progressive bias on topics like [[gay marriage]] and the [[occupy movement]].<ref>[https://www.politico.com/blogs/media/2012/08/ny-times-public-editor-progressive-worldview-bleeds-133188.html]</ref> Its publisher, Arthur Ochs Sulzberger, Jr. has denied the papers extreme left bias, claiming instead that the paper has an "urban" viewpoint.<ref>https://www.nytimes.com/2004/07/25/weekinreview/25bott.html?ei=5088&en=452926dcb11511a3&ex=1248667200&pagewanted=all&position=</ref> |