Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 14: Line 14:     
::::Heritage is without a doubt questionable, but I don't think it's as bad a Cato or some other organization like that, so adding Heritage to this article in some way would be a good idea, so I think a "debatable" section is a good idea. ADF can stay in the "regular" section. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 22:11, 4 May 2019 (EDT)
 
::::Heritage is without a doubt questionable, but I don't think it's as bad a Cato or some other organization like that, so adding Heritage to this article in some way would be a good idea, so I think a "debatable" section is a good idea. ADF can stay in the "regular" section. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 22:11, 4 May 2019 (EDT)
 +
 +
:::::Hmm... I already hit a bit of an issue.  Are we categorizing by what they aim to do (i.e. pro-life) or how they do it (i.e. Education)?  I was thinking of adding [https://www.liveaction.org/ LiveAction] to this list, which would fall under both of these categories.
Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, Check users, delete, edit, Moderators, move, oversight, protect, ratelimit-exempt, rollback, Administrators
20,274

edits

Navigation menu