Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, Check users, delete, edit, move, oversight, protect, rollback, Administrators
51,035
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 17:
Line 17: + +
Talk:Major conservative organizations (view source)
Revision as of 02:43, May 5, 2019
, 02:43, May 5, 2019no edit summary
:::::Hmm... I already hit a bit of an issue. Are we categorizing by what they aim to do (i.e. pro-life) or how they do it (i.e. Education)? I was thinking of adding [https://www.liveaction.org/ LiveAction] to this list, which would fall under both of these categories.
:::::Hmm... I already hit a bit of an issue. Are we categorizing by what they aim to do (i.e. pro-life) or how they do it (i.e. Education)? I was thinking of adding [https://www.liveaction.org/ LiveAction] to this list, which would fall under both of these categories.
:::::It's easy to be general using "how" categories, but "what" categories make more sense. I think I got derailed. --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">DavidB4</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</sup> 22:40, 4 May 2019 (EDT)
:::::It's easy to be general using "how" categories, but "what" categories make more sense. I think I got derailed. --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">DavidB4</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</sup> 22:40, 4 May 2019 (EDT)
::::::I think "what" is better, as organizations are more identifiable that way. It's easier to find a group based on its focus rather than its methods -- however, if an organization focuses on general conservative public policy, I think an "education" category is fine if worded in a way to make clear that they don't necessarily focus only on education public policy. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 22:43, 4 May 2019 (EDT)