Changes

In 2017 the total circulation of ''The Guardian'' had dropped to 149,000, making it number 19 among British newspapers.

In 2017 the total circulation of ''The Guardian'' had dropped to 149,000, making it number 19 among British newspapers.

==Examples of Inaccuracy and Bias==

==Examples of inaccuracy and bias==

In 2016, when the UK magistrate Richard Page was dismissed from his post in the judiciary for merely saying he believed children were better off with a mother and father, ''The Guardian'' reported the case as "Magistrate sacked over religious opposition to same-sex couples adopting". This was not true. Page's opinion was based on the best interests of the children and their welfare, not on a mere religious prohibition. Page's view is supported by the best available scientific evidence i.e. the Regnerus Report. Within a few months of Page's dismissal, in 2017, a pair of lesbians, Deborah and “wife” Jennifer Harrison, were convicted of starving a child and hitting her with a hammer. Very soon afterwards, a baby girl named Elsie was murdered by her homosexual adoptive "father" Matthew Scully-Hicks. ''The Guardian'' did not connect the three cases.

In 2016, when the UK magistrate Richard Page was dismissed from his post in the judiciary for merely saying he believed children were better off with a mother and father, ''The Guardian'' reported the case as "Magistrate sacked over religious opposition to same-sex couples adopting". This was not true. Page's opinion was based on the best interests of the children and their welfare, not on a mere religious prohibition. Page's view is supported by the best available scientific evidence i.e. the Regnerus Report. Within a few months of Page's dismissal, in 2017, a pair of lesbians, Deborah and “wife” Jennifer Harrison, were convicted of starving a child and hitting her with a hammer. Very soon afterward, a baby girl named Elsie was murdered by her homosexual adoptive "father" Matthew Scully-Hicks. ''The Guardian'' did not connect the three cases.<ref>theguardian.com, 10 March 2016</ref><ref>https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/3660471/mum-lover-jailed-abuse-starving-daughter/</ref><ref>https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/nov/06/matthew-scully-hicks-guilty-of-murdering-adopted-daughter</ref><ref>https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/nov/07/matthew-scully-hicks-jailed-for-life-daughter-elsie</ref>

<ref>theguardian.com, 10 March 2016</ref><ref>https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/3660471/mum-lover-jailed-abuse-starving-daughter/</ref><ref>https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/nov/06/matthew-scully-hicks-guilty-of-murdering-adopted-daughter</ref><ref>https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/nov/07/matthew-scully-hicks-jailed-for-life-daughter-elsie</ref>

In September 2016, ''The Guardian'' reported that there had been a huge "spike" in hate-crimes against Eastern Europeans in Britain since the Brexit vote, and highlighted the death of Arkadiusz Jóźwik, who died in a late-night fight in Harlow, Essex, which they called a  "suspected hate-crime".<ref>

In September 2016, ''The Guardian'' reported that there had been a huge "spike" in hate-crimes against Eastern Europeans in Britain since the Brexit vote, and highlighted the death of Arkadiusz Jóźwik, who died in a late-night fight in Harlow, Essex, which they called a  "suspected hate-crime".<ref>

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Easy-Meat-Britains-Grooming-Scandal/dp/1943003068 </ref> The authorities continue to turn a blind eye or minimize the problem. Robinson and others have been whistle-blowers, and the government was intent on silencing him but the article presents the protesters as merely "racists" who have no genuine grievance, which is a grave misrepresentation.

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Easy-Meat-Britains-Grooming-Scandal/dp/1943003068 </ref> The authorities continue to turn a blind eye or minimize the problem. Robinson and others have been whistle-blowers, and the government was intent on silencing him but the article presents the protesters as merely "racists" who have no genuine grievance, which is a grave misrepresentation.

In May 2019, the newspaper announced it would use the terms "climate emergency, crisis or breakdown" rather than "climate change."<ref>Frazin, Rachel (May 17, 2019). [https://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/444327-guardian-updates-style-climate-change-now-climate-emergency-crisis Guardian updates style: Climate change now 'climate emergency, crisis or breakdown']. ''The Hill''. Retrieved May 17, 2019.</ref>

Following the [[Brexit|referendum on European Union membership]], which the Leave faction narrowly won, ''The Guardian'' ran a series of articles attributing the outcome to sinister foreign influences or illegal funding, attempting to prove that the result was invalid. One of these, by Carole Cadwalla, claimed that UK's Information Commissioner's Office had launched legal proceedings against Arron Banks and the LEAVE.EU campaign. This was not true. <ref>https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/may/07/the-great-british-brexit-robbery-hijacked-democracy</ref>

==Misleading Statistics about Transgender==

''The Guardian'' regularly publishes articles claiming that half of the children diagnosed as so-called "transgender" in the UK have attempted suicide. But these figures are dubious as they do not come from an objective source, only from LGBT campaigning groups such Stonewall which use online surveys, very small sample spaces, and have no proof that the answers correspond to fact. These organisations get more and more funding according to the size of the problem they claim exists.

 

==Misleading statistics about transgenderism==

''The Guardian'' regularly publishes articles claiming that half of the children diagnosed as so-called "[[transgender]]" in the UK have attempted suicide. But these figures are dubious as they do not come from an objective source, only from LGBT campaigning groups such Stonewall which use online surveys, very small sample spaces, and have no proof that the answers correspond to fact. These organisations get more and more funding according to the size of the problem they claim exists.

<ref> https://www.theguardian.com/society/2014/nov/19/young-transgender-suicide-attempts-survey</ref>

<ref> https://www.theguardian.com/society/2014/nov/19/young-transgender-suicide-attempts-survey</ref>

<ref>https://www.theguardian.com/education/2017/jun/27/half-of-trans-pupils-in-the-uk-tried-to-take-their-own-lives-survey-finds</ref>

<ref>https://www.theguardian.com/education/2017/jun/27/half-of-trans-pupils-in-the-uk-tried-to-take-their-own-lives-survey-finds</ref>

<ref>https://www.theguardian.com/global/commentisfree/2017/nov/17/trans-people-children-suicide-bullying-rightwing-media</ref>

<ref>https://www.theguardian.com/global/commentisfree/2017/nov/17/trans-people-children-suicide-bullying-rightwing-media</ref>

<ref>https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/mar/28/trans-young-people-suicide-support-mental-health</ref>

<ref>https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/mar/28/trans-young-people-suicide-support-mental-health</ref>

When checked objectively by FullFact.com, there was a lot of doubt about the accuracy of the figures. <ref> https://fullfact.org/health/young-trans-people/</ref> There are no statistics that prove transgender people become any less likely to commit suicide in later life if their delusion is affirmed and made official. Moreover, what such alarmist reports do not mention is that the actual number of children classified as "trans" in the UK has rocketed by 2,000% in eight years, in response to LGBT ideas being taught in schools. So if the problem exists it is being created by the LGBTs.

When checked objectively by FullFact.com, there was a lot of doubt about the accuracy of the figures.<ref>https://fullfact.org/health/young-trans-people/</ref> There are no statistics that prove transgender people become any less likely to commit suicide in later life if their delusion is affirmed and made official. Moreover, what such alarmist reports do not mention is that the actual number of children classified as "trans" in the UK has rocketed by 2,000% in eight years, in response to LGBT ideas being taught in schools. So if the problem exists it is being created by the LGBTs.

<ref>https://www.reddit.com/r/GenderCritical/comments/7xhanp/schools_resource_pack_transgender_trend/</ref>

<ref>https://www.reddit.com/r/GenderCritical/comments/7xhanp/schools_resource_pack_transgender_trend/</ref>

GID specialists are warning that hasty treatment or premature treatment is not in the interest of the children. <ref> https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/schools-rushing-on-whisper-to-label-pupils-as-transgender-0d8zm53qs</ref>

GID specialists are warning that hasty treatment or premature treatment is not in the interest of the children.<ref>https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/schools-rushing-on-whisper-to-label-pupils-as-transgender-0d8zm53qs</ref>

==Notable Employees==

==Notable employees==

[[Paris Lees]] and [[Jane Francesca Fae]] two of ''The Guardian'''s transgender journalists, both have unusual backgrounds. Lees has served prison time for the crime of violent assault, while Fae, whose previous name was John Ozimek, campaigned for ten years for the legalisation of extreme and hard-core pornography. He is currently suspended from the UK [[Labour Party]] for repeatedly inciting violent attacks on women. <ref> https://twitter.com/CorrectMorally/status/1003555983308673024</ref><ref>https://twitter.com/fakerikiw/status/972797636481871872</ref>

[[Paris Lees]] and [[Jane Francesca Fae]] two of ''The Guardian'''s transgender journalists, both have unusual backgrounds. Lees has served prison time for the crime of violent assault, while Fae, whose previous name was John Ozimek, campaigned for ten years for the legalisation of extreme and hard-core pornography. He is currently suspended from the UK [[Labour Party]] for repeatedly inciting violent attacks on women.<ref>https://twitter.com/CorrectMorally/status/1003555983308673024</ref><ref>https://twitter.com/fakerikiw/status/972797636481871872</ref>

==Campaign against UKIP==

==Campaign against UKIP==

''The Guardian'' newspaper conducted a fierce campaign against the UK Independence Party (UKIP) a political party formed in 1992 with the aim of withdrawing the UK from the European Union. ''The Guardian'' branded UKIP a "far-right" and "neo-fascist" party without any evidence either from its manifesto or anywhere else, and printed smear articles about virtually every prominent member of UKIP on a regular basis, claiming they were racist, guilty of financial misconduct etc. An example of how they distorted the facts is a story they printed on 13 June 2017 with the headline “MEP resigns amid investigation into alleged misuse of funds”.<ref>https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/jun/13/ukip-mep-resigns-amid-investigation-into-alleged-misuse-of-funds</ref> The article reported that Roger Helmer, a UKIP member of the [[European Parliament]], was going to resign while undergoing investigation for alleged misuse of funds. The implication was that his resignation was triggered by the investigation, and was an admission of guilt.<ref>https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/jun/13/ukip-mep-resigns-amid-investigation-into-alleged-misuse-of-funds</ref> That was highly misleading. In fact, Helmer who was aged 73, had decided to retire because after the Leave vote in the EU Referendum held in May 2016, he regarded his work as done and was looking forward to retirement. Some months previously, EU officials had challenged two of his staff, Nick Tite and Paul Oakden, to prove that they had done the work for which they were claiming payment through EU expenses. That is a routine gambit used by the EU to harass and make life difficult for all MEPs who campaign against their country's membership. All UKIP MEPS are regularly subjected to this sort of inspection, while MEPS of other parties are not. Just before the ''Guardian'' story appeared, Nick Tite had been cleared, and no evidence of misconduct was ever found against the other staffer either. No money ever had to be paid back, and there was no connection between either case and Helmer's retirement.

''The Guardian'' newspaper conducted a fierce campaign against the UK Independence Party (UKIP) a political party formed in 1992 with the aim of withdrawing the UK from the European Union. ''The Guardian'' branded UKIP a "far-right" and "neo-fascist" party without any evidence either from its manifesto or anywhere else, and printed smear articles about virtually every prominent member of UKIP on a regular basis, claiming they were racist, guilty of financial misconduct etc. An example of how they distorted the facts is a story they printed on 13 June 2017 with the headline "MEP resigns amid investigation into alleged misuse of funds".<ref>https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/jun/13/ukip-mep-resigns-amid-investigation-into-alleged-misuse-of-funds</ref> The article reported that Roger Helmer, a UKIP member of the [[European Parliament]], was going to resign while undergoing investigation for alleged misuse of funds. The implication was that his resignation was triggered by the investigation, and was an admission of guilt.<ref>https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/jun/13/ukip-mep-resigns-amid-investigation-into-alleged-misuse-of-funds</ref> That was highly misleading. In fact, Helmer who was aged 73, had decided to retire because after the Leave vote in the EU Referendum held in May 2016, he regarded his work as done and was looking forward to retirement. Some months previously, EU officials had challenged two of his staff, Nick Tite and Paul Oakden, to prove that they had done the work for which they were claiming payment through EU expenses. That is a routine gambit used by the EU to harass and make life difficult for all MEPs who campaign against their country's membership. All UKIP MEPS are regularly subjected to this sort of inspection, while MEPS of other parties are not. Just before the ''Guardian'' story appeared, Nick Tite had been cleared, and no evidence of misconduct was ever found against the other staffer either. No money ever had to be paid back, and there was no connection between either case and Helmer's retirement.<ref>https://rogerhelmermep.wordpress.com/2017/06/25/the-european-parliament-an-apology/</ref> Nevertheless, despite a refutation by Helmer on his personal blog, ''The Guardian'' never withdrew its slanderous allegations, and still has the story on its website. The story was copied from ''The Guardian'' to other sources where the allegations were made even more explicitly. Free newspaper ''The Metro'' ran a story with the headline "UKIP MEP quits over “misuse of £100,000 of EU money”. False allegations of disgrace were then spread widely, and never retracted. Helmer commented that ''The Guardian'' was motivated by "malice". Their story described him as having "controversial views on homosexuality". What they deemed "controversial views" was his defence of man-woman marriage and objection to threats and menace against those who wished to uphold it.<ref>https://www.pinknews.co.uk/2015/02/20/ukip-mep-who-said-homophobia-doesnt-exist-complains-about-ukip-phobia/</ref>

.<ref>https://rogerhelmermep.wordpress.com/2017/06/25/the-european-parliament-an-apology/</ref> Nevertheless, despite a refutation by Helmer on his personal blog, ''The Guardian'' never withdrew its slanderous allegations, and still has the story on its website. The story was copied from ''The Guardian'' to other sources where the allegations were made even more explicitly. Free newspaper ''The Metro'' ran a story with the headline "UKIP MEP quits over “misuse of £100,000 of EU money”. False allegations of disgrace were then spread widely, and never retracted. Helmer commented that ''The Guardian'' was motivated by "malice". Their story described him as having "controversial views on homosexuality". What they deemed "controversial views" was his defence of man-woman marriage and objection to threats and menace against those who wished to uphold it.<ref>

https://www.pinknews.co.uk/2015/02/20/ukip-mep-who-said-homophobia-doesnt-exist-complains-about-ukip-phobia/</ref>

==Website==

==Website==

{{cquote|The [[Richard Dawkins|Dawkins]] inspired "atheist ranters" come out in force on ''Guardian'' pages. They hate organised religion with a zeal, they deride the faithful as mentally retarded, they gibber on about [[Flying Spaghetti Monster|spaghetti monsters]] and sky pixies, as if such talk actually added anything meaningful to the debate. ... It is easy to picture these sycophantic drones smugly typing their intolerant bile, glowing with inner pride at their own rebellious contrariness.|||''Another Angry Voice'', a [[socialist]] internet blogger.<ref>[http://anotherangryvoice.blogspot.co.uk/2012/02/richard-dawkins-slave-ancestor.html Richard Dawkins and the slave trade], ''Another Angry Voice''.</ref>}}

{{cquote|The [[Richard Dawkins|Dawkins]] inspired "atheist ranters" come out in force on ''Guardian'' pages. They hate organised religion with a zeal, they deride the faithful as mentally retarded, they gibber on about [[Flying Spaghetti Monster|spaghetti monsters]] and sky pixies, as if such talk actually added anything meaningful to the debate. ... It is easy to picture these sycophantic drones smugly typing their intolerant bile, glowing with inner pride at their own rebellious contrariness.|||''Another Angry Voice'', a [[socialist]] internet blogger.<ref>[http://anotherangryvoice.blogspot.co.uk/2012/02/richard-dawkins-slave-ancestor.html Richard Dawkins and the slave trade], ''Another Angry Voice''.</ref>}}

''The Guardian'' has recently set up versions of its website in Australia and the United States; its website in the [[United Kingdom]] is one of the most popular in the country, and the majority of the site's views come from the [[United States|US]].<ref>However, despite being a UK-based website, ''guardian.co.uk'' is a more popular in the [[United States]] and multiculturalist [[Sweden]] than in the UK.<br>[http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/guardian.co.uk Statistics Summary for guardian.co.uk]</ref> ''The Guardian'' also runs the largest internet forum of any British newspaper in the form of Guardian Unlimited Talk.

''The Guardian'' has recently set up versions of its website in Australia and the United States; its website in the [[United Kingdom]] is one of the most popular in the country, and the majority of the site's views come from the [[United States]].<ref>However, despite being a UK-based website, ''guardian.co.uk'' is a more popular in the United States and multiculturalist [[Sweden]] than in the UK.<br>[http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/guardian.co.uk Statistics Summary for guardian.co.uk]</ref> ''The Guardian'' also runs the largest internet forum of any British newspaper in the form of Guardian Unlimited Talk.

The comments on their internet opinion blog, ''Comment is Free'', are filtered by a moderator.

The comments on their internet opinion blog, ''Comment is Free'', are filtered by a moderator.

==Political Stance==

==Political stance==

The paper was described in the 1930s as "the Communist paper, The ''Manchester Guardian''" by Lord Beaverbrook,<ref>Crozier, W.P., edited by A.J.P.Taylor, ''Off The Record'', London, 1973, p.259. ISBN 0-09-116250-5 "''I found Beaverbrook with Walter Citrine, General Secretary of the TUC. He presented me to him (Citrine) as 'The Editor of the Communist paper, The ''Manchester Guardian''.<nowiki>'</nowiki>''"</ref> and even earlier in Victorian times by the [[communist]] [[Friedrich Engels]] as "an organ of the middle class",<ref>[[Friedrich Engels|Engels, Friedrich]], ''The Condition of the Working Class in England'', Progress, 1973, p. 109.</ref> and by Ted Scott as "a paper that will remain [[bourgeois]] to the last".<ref>Ayerst, ''The Guardian'', 1971, p. 471.</ref>

The paper was described in the 1930s as "the Communist paper, The ''Manchester Guardian''" by Lord Beaverbrook,<ref>Crozier, W.P., edited by A.J.P.Taylor, ''Off The Record'', London, 1973, p.259. ISBN 0-09-116250-5 "''I found Beaverbrook with Walter Citrine, General Secretary of the TUC. He presented me to him (Citrine) as 'The Editor of the Communist paper, The ''Manchester Guardian''.<nowiki>'</nowiki>''"</ref> and even earlier in Victorian times by the [[communist]] [[Friedrich Engels]] as "an organ of the middle class",<ref>[[Friedrich Engels|Engels, Friedrich]], ''The Condition of the Working Class in England'', Progress, 1973, p. 109.</ref> and by Ted Scott as "a paper that will remain [[bourgeois]] to the last".<ref>Ayerst, ''The Guardian'', 1971, p. 471.</ref>

Today in 2018, the Guardian is regarded as a far-left [[liberal]] paper, as well as being pro-[[abortion]] on demand, anti-[[Bush]] and anti-[[American]], pro-[[Obama]] and critical of [[Tony Blair]]'s support for the war in [[Iraq]] (and of New Labour in general). The newspaper's reputation as a platform for [[liberal]] and left-wing opinions has led to the use of the epithets "''Guardian'' reader" and "Guardianista" for people holding such views,<ref>{{cite web|author=Department of the Official Report (Hansard), House of Commons, Westminster |url=http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200102/cmhansrd/vo011119/debtext/11119-08.htm#11119-08_spnew3 |title=Hansard 374:54 19 November 2001 |publisher=Publications.parliament.uk |date=19 November 2001 |accessdate=28 July 2009}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/northern_ireland/4348620.stm|title=What the papers say|work=BBC News|date=17 October 2005}}</ref> or as a negative stereotype of such people as middle class, and [[politically correct]].

Today in 2018, the Guardian is regarded as a far-left [[liberal]] paper, as well as being pro-[[abortion]] on demand, anti-[[Bush]] and anti-[[American]], pro-[[Obama]] and critical of [[Tony Blair]]'s support for the war in [[Iraq]] (and of New Labour in general). The newspaper's reputation as a platform for [[liberal]] and left-wing opinions has led to the use of the epithets "''Guardian'' reader" and "Guardianista" for people holding such views,<ref>{{cite web|author=Department of the Official Report (Hansard), House of Commons, Westminster |url=http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200102/cmhansrd/vo011119/debtext/11119-08.htm#11119-08_spnew3 |title=Hansard 374:54 19 November 2001 |publisher=Publications.parliament.uk |date=19 November 2001 |accessdate=28 July 2009}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/northern_ireland/4348620.stm|title=What the papers say|work=BBC News|date=17 October 2005}}</ref> or as a negative stereotype of such people as middle class, and [[politically correct]].

===Clark County Fiasco===

===Clark County fiasco===

On October 13, 2004, the Guardian paper attempted to influence the election between [[George W. Bush]] and [[John Kerry]] in one particular Ohio county, Clark County.<ref>[http://archive.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=10846 Euro-Socialists Say: Assassinate Bush], Operation Clark County, post-mortem, [[FrontPage Magazine]]</ref><ref>[https://www.theguardian.com/world/2004/oct/13/uselections2004.usa11 My fellow non-Americans ... ]</ref>  They called it "''Operation Clark County''",<ref>[https://www.theguardian.com/world/2004/oct/18/uselections2004.usa2 Dear Limey assholes]</ref> and the effort is generally regarded to have been a failure and a fiasco for the paper.<ref>[https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/1474828/Guardian-calls-it-quits-in-Clark-County-fiasco.html Guardian calls it quits in Clark County fiasco], [[Daily Telegraph]]</ref><ref>[http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/3981823.stm Did Guardian turn Ohio to Bush?], [[BBC]]</ref><ref>[http://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/lady-antonia-of-clark-county-532409.html Lady Antonia of Clark County], Why 'The Guardian' and its readers are still feeling the wrath of Ohio , [[The Independent]]</ref><ref>[http://mammon.typepad.com/root_of_all_evil/2008/11/us-election-2008-remembering-guardians-operation-clark-county.html US election 2008: remembering Guardian's Operation Clark County]</ref><ref>[http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/politicselections/vote2004/2004-11-04-brits-letters_x.htm Brits' campaign backfires in Ohio], [[USA Today]]</ref>

On October 13, 2004, the Guardian paper attempted to influence the election between [[George W. Bush]] and [[John Kerry]] in one particular Ohio county, Clark County.<ref>[http://archive.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=10846 Euro-Socialists Say: Assassinate Bush], Operation Clark County, post-mortem, [[FrontPage Magazine]]</ref><ref>[https://www.theguardian.com/world/2004/oct/13/uselections2004.usa11 My fellow non-Americans ... ]</ref>  They called it "''Operation Clark County''",<ref>[https://www.theguardian.com/world/2004/oct/18/uselections2004.usa2 Dear Limey assholes]</ref> and the effort is generally regarded to have been a failure and a fiasco for the paper.<ref>[https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/1474828/Guardian-calls-it-quits-in-Clark-County-fiasco.html Guardian calls it quits in Clark County fiasco], [[Daily Telegraph]]</ref><ref>[http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/3981823.stm Did Guardian turn Ohio to Bush?], [[BBC]]</ref><ref>[http://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/lady-antonia-of-clark-county-532409.html Lady Antonia of Clark County], Why 'The Guardian' and its readers are still feeling the wrath of Ohio , [[The Independent]]</ref><ref>[http://mammon.typepad.com/root_of_all_evil/2008/11/us-election-2008-remembering-guardians-operation-clark-county.html US election 2008: remembering Guardian's Operation Clark County]</ref><ref>[http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/politicselections/vote2004/2004-11-04-brits-letters_x.htm Brits' campaign backfires in Ohio], [[USA Today]]</ref>

==References==

==References==

{{reflist|2}}

{{Reflist|colwidth=35em}}

[[Category:United Kingdom Newspapers]]

[[Category:United Kingdom Newspapers]]