Changes

O'Carroll moved to England in the 1960s. In 1979, O’Carroll was secretary of the UK [[Paedophile Information Exchange]]. When it was officially disbanded he carried on as a prominent member of its successor, the International Paedophile and Child Emancipation group (IPCEG). He was also a press officer for the UK Open University, a publicly-funded institution with a crudely pro-homosexual bias.  

O'Carroll moved to England in the 1960s. In 1979, O’Carroll was secretary of the UK [[Paedophile Information Exchange]]. When it was officially disbanded he carried on as a prominent member of its successor, the International Paedophile and Child Emancipation group (IPCEG). He was also a press officer for the UK Open University, a publicly-funded institution with a crudely pro-homosexual bias.  

He was for twenty years from 1975 onwards the protegé of the UK National Council for Civil Liberties (NCCL, now Liberty), which supported [[PIE]] and in his book “Paedophilia: the Radical Case,” published in 1980, <ref>Tom O’Carroll, Paedophilia: The Radical Case, pub. Peter Owen, London, 1980, ISBN 0 7206 0546 6</ref> he heartily thanked those who helped him write it “especially… Ms Nettie Pollard of the National Council for Civil Liberties [who] read the whole text in draft and made many helpful suggestions”.

He was for twenty years from 1975 onwards the protegé of the UK National Council for Civil Liberties (NCCL, now Liberty), which supported [[PIE]] and in his book “Paedophilia: the Radical Case,” published in 1980, <ref>Tom O’Carroll, Paedophilia: The Radical Case, pub. Peter Owen, London, 1980, ISBN 0 7206 0546 6</ref> he heartily thanked those who helped him write it “especially… Ms Nettie Pollard of the National Council for Civil Liberties [who] read the whole text in draft and made many helpful suggestions”.

NCCL’s secretary, Patricia Hewitt, later a [[Labour]] MP refused to say that pedophilia was wrong, but merely said “public hostility to pedophilia was such that it damaged the cause of gay rights for the gay movement to be associated with it”.<ref>https://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/10653944/The-right-to-sleep-with-children-was-one-civil-liberty-that-NCCL-supported.html</ref>

NCCL's secretary, Patricia Hewitt, later a [[Labour]] MP refused to say that pedophilia was wrong, but merely said “public hostility to pedophilia was such that it damaged the cause of gay rights for the gay movement to be associated with it”.<ref>https://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/10653944/The-right-to-sleep-with-children-was-one-civil-liberty-that-NCCL-supported.html</ref>

==Published Works==

==Published Works==

==Criminal Convictions==

==Criminal Convictions==

In 1981 Tom O’Carroll was jailed for “conspiring to corrupt public morals” by publishing ‘contact’ advertisements (which put readers in touch with vendors of child porn) in an edition of PIE’s publication ''The Magpie.''

In 1981 Tom O’Carroll was jailed for “conspiring to corrupt public morals” by publishing ‘contact’ advertisements (which put readers in touch with vendors of child porn) in an edition of PIE's publication ''The Magpie.''

In 2002 O'Carroll was found guilty of evading a prohibition on the importation of indecent photographs of children from Qatar. He was given a nine-month sentence on the basis of three images, a sentence later overturned by appeal. O'Carroll was convicted again in 2006 of conspiring to distribute indecent photographs of children. He was arrested after undercover police infiltrated the IPCEG and its subsidiary, Gentlemen with an Interesting Name. “According to police O’Carroll saw the groups as a base for an “international secret society” of “academic” child abusers… Children, mainly boys and some as young as six, had been filmed and photographed being raped and tortured.” The cache was found in the Surrey home of a former vicar, Michael John De Clare Studdert, exposed as a [[PIE]] member. O’Carroll was arrested 1 June 2006 on child pornography charges. In September 2006, he admitted to two counts of distributing indecent images of children. On 20 December 2006, he was jailed for two and a half years.<ref>https://www.irishtimes.com/news/irish-paedohphile-campaigner-jailed-in-uk-1.800953</ref>

In 2002 O'Carroll was found guilty of evading a prohibition on the importation of indecent photographs of children from Qatar. He was given a nine-month sentence on the basis of three images, a sentence later overturned by appeal. O'Carroll was convicted again in 2006 of conspiring to distribute indecent photographs of children. He was arrested after undercover police infiltrated the IPCEG and its subsidiary, Gentlemen with an Interesting Name. “According to police O’Carroll saw the groups as a base for an “international secret society” of “academic” child abusers... Children, mainly boys and some as young as six, had been filmed and photographed being raped and tortured.” The cache was found in the Surrey home of a former vicar, Michael John De Clare Studdert, exposed as a [[PIE]] member. O’Carroll was arrested 1 June 2006 on child pornography charges. In September 2006, he admitted to two counts of distributing indecent images of children. On 20 December 2006, he was jailed for two and a half years.<ref>https://www.irishtimes.com/news/irish-paedohphile-campaigner-jailed-in-uk-1.800953</ref>

Police investigating the case seized more than 50,000 indecent images, from a variety of addresses. Some showed images of a man abusing a one-year-old boy. A detective who had worked on the prosecution told reporters: ‘I’ve been dealing with hard pornography for ten years now, but what I saw in this case made me go outside for a walk. It was awful. Awful.’ <ref>http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/coventry_warwickshire/6196811.stm</ref>

Police investigating the case seized more than 50,000 indecent images, from a variety of addresses. Some showed images of a man abusing a one-year-old boy. A detective who had worked on the prosecution told reporters: ‘I’ve been dealing with hard pornography for ten years now, but what I saw in this case made me go outside for a walk. It was awful. Awful.’ <ref>http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/coventry_warwickshire/6196811.stm</ref>

O'Carroll writes a blog that should alert people to the true nature of the LGBT movement (better described as the LGBTP movement i.e. Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transsexual and Pedophile). <ref>http://tomocarroll.wordpress.com/ </ref>  

O'Carroll writes a blog that should alert people to the true nature of the LGBT movement (better described as the LGBTP movement i.e. Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transsexual and Pedophile). <ref>http://tomocarroll.wordpress.com/ </ref>  

O’Carroll laughs at “the current “politically correct” claim that gay men are no more likely to “molest” underage boys than straight men are likely to “molest” underage girls.” He argues “the falsity of the new language, which obscures an extensive “cross-over” phenomenon. In fact, whether we call it “gay” or not, '''men show a disproportionately higher homosexual interest in children than heterosexual.''' Research suggests that about a third of male paedophiles prefer boys, about a third prefer girls, and a third are attracted to both. The one third preferring boys is a very high figure given that only about 5% of all men in society are preferentially homosexual. Consider, too, Ray Blanchard’s experimental work: he has demonstrated that men typically have a significant degree of sexual response to their second age category preferences as well as their first: the erectile response of teleiophilic men (i.e. “gay” ones, preferentially attracted to adult males) to erotic images of pubescent boys is on average well over 60% of their response to such images of grown men. '''A key implication is that the gay men who loudly insist there is no connection whatever between gayness and boy love are making a politically expedient but factually flawed claim.'''”

O’Carroll laughs at “the current “politically correct” claim that gay men are no more likely to “molest” underage boys than straight men are likely to “molest” underage girls.” He argues “the falsity of the new language, which obscures an extensive “cross-over” phenomenon. In fact, whether we call it “gay” or not, '''men show a disproportionately higher homosexual interest in children than heterosexual.''' Research suggests that about a third of male paedophiles prefer boys, about a third prefer girls, and a third are attracted to both. The one third preferring boys is a very high figure given that only about 5% of all men in society are preferentially homosexual. Consider, too, Ray Blanchard's experimental work: he has demonstrated that men typically have a significant degree of sexual response to their second age category preferences as well as their first: the erectile response of teleiophilic men (i.e. “gay” ones, preferentially attracted to adult males) to erotic images of pubescent boys is on average well over 60% of their response to such images of grown men. '''A key implication is that the gay men who loudly insist there is no connection whatever between gayness and boy love are making a politically expedient but factually flawed claim.'''”

<ref>https://tomocarroll.wordpress.com/2013/12/23/benjamin-britten-both-gay-and-a-boy-lover/</ref><ref>http://en.cyclopaedia.net/wiki/Paedophilia-.-The-Radical-Case </ref>

<ref>https://tomocarroll.wordpress.com/2013/12/23/benjamin-britten-both-gay-and-a-boy-lover/</ref><ref>http://en.cyclopaedia.net/wiki/Paedophilia-.-The-Radical-Case </ref>