| Line 83: |
Line 83: |
| | |This radically anti-[[Vietnam War]] biographical film was produced and directed by Communist sympathizer and twice wounded Vietnam War veteran Oliver Stone, starring Tom Cruise as paralyzed Vietnam War vet-turned-anti-Vietnam War leftist protester and Communist sympathizer [[Ron Kovic]]. | | |This radically anti-[[Vietnam War]] biographical film was produced and directed by Communist sympathizer and twice wounded Vietnam War veteran Oliver Stone, starring Tom Cruise as paralyzed Vietnam War vet-turned-anti-Vietnam War leftist protester and Communist sympathizer [[Ron Kovic]]. |
| | |$70,001,698 | | |$70,001,698 |
| | + | |- |
| | + | |''Bushwick'' |
| | + | |2017 |
| | + | |TV-MA |
| | + | |The dystopian thriller features Red State dwellers (depicted as racist) declaring war on Hipster Brooklyn. |
| | + | |N./A |
| | |- | | |- |
| | |''The Butler'' | | |''The Butler'' |
| | |2013 | | |2013 |
| | |PG-13 | | |PG-13 |
| − | |[[Ronald Reagan]] is falsely portrayed as indifferent toward apartheid in South Africa; Nancy Reagan is played by anti-American traitor Jane Fonda; and staunch feminist Oprah Winfrey plays Cecil's wife. | + | |[[Ronald Reagan]] is falsely portrayed as indifferent toward apartheid in South Africa; Nancy Reagan is played by anti-American traitor Jane Fonda, and staunch feminist Oprah Winfrey plays Cecil's wife. |
| | |$116,632,095 | | |$116,632,095 |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 119: |
Line 125: |
| | |A fictional [[nuclear power]] plant melts down. The film greatly over-hypes this risk of a [[nuclear accident]] (or meltdown) and the resultant damage. This film, along with the [[Three Mile Island]] incident (which occurred shortly after the film's release), are both credited for killing the nuclear power industry in America. | | |A fictional [[nuclear power]] plant melts down. The film greatly over-hypes this risk of a [[nuclear accident]] (or meltdown) and the resultant damage. This film, along with the [[Three Mile Island]] incident (which occurred shortly after the film's release), are both credited for killing the nuclear power industry in America. |
| | |$51,718,367 | | |$51,718,367 |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |''Chuck & Buck''
| |
| − | |2000
| |
| − | |R
| |
| − | |Debauched independent film about a man who revisits another man he traumatized through sexual grooming as a child. The message is that in some instances, groomers are the real victims and greatly misunderstood because of their need for casual sex. Also, if their victims weren't "brainwashed" by moralistic views about sex, most of them would consent to it and see it as a good thing, and no trauma would ever happen. In the film, when he meets the man he seduced in their youth, he encourages him to cheat on his wife, who is "holding him back", and have sex with him in order to desensitize him to hedonism and see monogamy as a perversion. The director and writer of the film is openly bisexual, and plays the role of the groomer who initiates the encounter. He admits it is based on his experiences and fantasies.
| |
| − | |N/A
| |
| | |- | | |- |
| | |''A Clockwork Orange'' | | |''A Clockwork Orange'' |
| Line 688: |
Line 688: |
| | |This bastardization of an instantly recognizable children's classic, filled with adult humor and pandered to focus groups, is the reason why Dr. Seuss's widow has banned any live-action adaptations of Seuss's works. It won a one-time Golden Raspberry (or "Razzie") Award for "Worst Excuse for an Actual Movie (All Concept/No Content)" and was nominated for eight other Razzies. | | |This bastardization of an instantly recognizable children's classic, filled with adult humor and pandered to focus groups, is the reason why Dr. Seuss's widow has banned any live-action adaptations of Seuss's works. It won a one-time Golden Raspberry (or "Razzie") Award for "Worst Excuse for an Actual Movie (All Concept/No Content)" and was nominated for eight other Razzies. |
| | |$134 million | | |$134 million |
| | + | |- |
| | + | |''Chuck & Buck'' |
| | + | |2000 |
| | + | |R |
| | + | |Debauched independent film about a man who revisits another man he traumatized through sexual grooming as a child. The message is that in some instances, groomers are the real victims and greatly misunderstood because of their need for casual sex. Also, if their victims weren't "brainwashed" by moralistic views about sex, most of them would consent to it and see it as a good thing, and no trauma would ever happen. In the film, when he meets the man he seduced in their youth, he encourages him to cheat on his wife, who is "holding him back", and have sex with him in order to desensitize him to hedonism and see monogamy as a perversion. The director and writer of the film is openly bisexual, and plays the role of the groomer who initiates the encounter. He admits it is based on his experiences and fantasies. |
| | + | |N/A |
| | |- | | |- |
| | |''The Cider House Rules'' | | |''The Cider House Rules'' |
| Line 1,229: |
Line 1,235: |
| | |Based on the left-wing comic, this film glorifies feminism and debauchery while making the capitalists the bad guys. | | |Based on the left-wing comic, this film glorifies feminism and debauchery while making the capitalists the bad guys. |
| | |$4,064,495 | | |$4,064,495 |
| | + | |- |
| | + | |''Thank You For Smoking'' |
| | + | |2006 |
| | + | |R |
| | + | |The title is self-exploratory, depicts cigarette endorsers as heroes. |
| | + | |$24,793,509 |
| | |- | | |- |
| | |''That's My Boy'' | | |''That's My Boy'' |
| | |2012 | | |2012 |
| | |R (originally NC-17) | | |R (originally NC-17) |
| − | |Depicts pedophilia, statutory rape, gerontophilia, child neglect, incest, and other forms of aberrant sexuality as "funny". | + | |Depsite staring conservative actor Adams Sandler this films depicts pedophilia, statutory rape, gerontophilia, child neglect, incest, and other forms of aberrant sexuality as "funny". |
| | |$57.7 million | | |$57.7 million |
| | |- | | |- |