14
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 644:
Line 644: + + + +
Conservapedia talk:Commandments (view source)
Revision as of 07:35, May 10, 2007
, 07:35, May 10, 2007Added recommendation to add exemption for main page
Since a number of sysops have openly stated that they are enforcing rules that are not found in the Commandments (and a number of other syspos have enforced rules not found in the Comandments, without explicitly saying that was what they were doing), it seems to me that the statement “This page is the only rule page on Conservapedia. These guidelines are kept simple in order to avoid the arbitrary and biased enforcement that is rampant on Wikipedia.” doesn’t really belong on this page.
Since a number of sysops have openly stated that they are enforcing rules that are not found in the Commandments (and a number of other syspos have enforced rules not found in the Comandments, without explicitly saying that was what they were doing), it seems to me that the statement “This page is the only rule page on Conservapedia. These guidelines are kept simple in order to avoid the arbitrary and biased enforcement that is rampant on Wikipedia.” doesn’t really belong on this page.
It is misleading, and causes problems. --[[User:Reginod|Reginod]] 15:04, 3 May 2007 (EDT)
It is misleading, and causes problems. --[[User:Reginod|Reginod]] 15:04, 3 May 2007 (EDT)
== Commandments Do Not Apply to Conservapedia's Front Page ==
As per discussions on the talk page of the main page, and in Conservapedia Talk, apparently these commandments don't apply to Conservapedia's main page. I suggest adding a note to that effect to the commandment page, also indicating any other pages on the site which are exempt from the commandments.[[User:Dbarefoot|Dbarefoot]] 03:35, 10 May 2007 (EDT)