Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Corrected reference
Line 53: Line 53:  
Mr Page responded by calling the judgement ‘Illiberal and intolerant’.
 
Mr Page responded by calling the judgement ‘Illiberal and intolerant’.
 
Reacting to the news, Mr Page said: “I am surprised that the Lord Chancellor should seemingly pander to the new political orthodoxy when what it amounts to is social experimentation on the lives of the most vulnerable children in our communities. To punish me and to seek to silence me for expressing a dissenting view is deeply shocking. It is vital the family law courts always have in mind the best interests of the children.” <ref>http://www.christian.org.uk/news/jp-sacked-for-saying-mum-and-dad-best-to-adopt-kids/?e110316</ref><ref>JP sacked for voicing his views against same-sex adoption bbc.co.uk, 10 March 2016</ref>
 
Reacting to the news, Mr Page said: “I am surprised that the Lord Chancellor should seemingly pander to the new political orthodoxy when what it amounts to is social experimentation on the lives of the most vulnerable children in our communities. To punish me and to seek to silence me for expressing a dissenting view is deeply shocking. It is vital the family law courts always have in mind the best interests of the children.” <ref>http://www.christian.org.uk/news/jp-sacked-for-saying-mum-and-dad-best-to-adopt-kids/?e110316</ref><ref>JP sacked for voicing his views against same-sex adoption bbc.co.uk, 10 March 2016</ref>
This case has continued to be appealled and at the latest hearing Mr Page was again unsuccessful in overturning this precedent with the verdict being reported on 19th June 2019. The employment appeal tribunal decided his removal from the magistracy was "a proportionate limitation upon his right to freedom of expression and as such would be regarded as necessary in a democratic society for maintaining the authority or impartiality of the judiciary". After the hearing, Mr Page said it showed "a deeply intolerant society" and said he planned to appeal. <ref>https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-kent-48694066<ref>
+
This case has continued to be appealled and at the latest hearing Mr Page was again unsuccessful in overturning this precedent with the verdict being reported on 19th June 2019. The employment appeal tribunal decided his removal from the magistracy was "a proportionate limitation upon his right to freedom of expression and as such would be regarded as necessary in a democratic society for maintaining the authority or impartiality of the judiciary". After the hearing, Mr Page said it showed "a deeply intolerant society" and said he planned to appeal. <ref>https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-kent-48694066</ref>
    
==Mr and Mrs Bull==
 
==Mr and Mrs Bull==
2

edits

Navigation menu