Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, Check users, delete, edit, move, oversight, protect, rollback, Administrators
51,035
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 549:
Line 549: − + + + + + + + +
Donald Trump achievements: The courts (view source)
Revision as of 03:05, June 22, 2019
, 03:05, June 22, 2019→2019
*Somin, Ilya (June 20, 2019). [https://reason.com/2019/06/20/a-troubling-supreme-court-decision-on-non-delegation/ A Troubling Supreme Court Decision on Non-Delegation]. ''Reason''. Retrieved June 20, 2019.
*Somin, Ilya (June 20, 2019). [https://reason.com/2019/06/20/a-troubling-supreme-court-decision-on-non-delegation/ A Troubling Supreme Court Decision on Non-Delegation]. ''Reason''. Retrieved June 20, 2019.
*Canaparo, GianCarlo; Malcolm, John G. (June 21, 2019). [https://www.dailysignal.com/2019/06/21/supreme-court-misses-opportunity-to-stop-congress-outsourcing-its-power/ Supreme Court Misses Opportunity to Stop Congress Outsourcing Its Power]. ''The Daily Signal''. Retrieved June 21, 2019.
*Canaparo, GianCarlo; Malcolm, John G. (June 21, 2019). [https://www.dailysignal.com/2019/06/21/supreme-court-misses-opportunity-to-stop-congress-outsourcing-its-power/ Supreme Court Misses Opportunity to Stop Congress Outsourcing Its Power]. ''The Daily Signal''. Retrieved June 21, 2019.
*Severino, Carrie (June 21, 2019). [https://www.nationalreview.com/bench-memos/fragmented-gundy-court-suggests-the-nondelegation-doctrine-might-have-a-future/ The Fragmented Gundy Court Suggests the Nondelegation Doctrine Might Have a Future]. ''National Review''. Retrieved June 21, 2019.</ref>
*Severino, Carrie (June 21, 2019). [https://www.nationalreview.com/bench-memos/fragmented-gundy-court-suggests-the-nondelegation-doctrine-might-have-a-future/ The Fragmented Gundy Court Suggests the Nondelegation Doctrine Might Have a Future]. ''National Review''. Retrieved June 21, 2019.</ref> Additionally, while the case did not exactly revolve around immigration, by ruling that the government needed to prove that an illegal migrant knew that he or she was banned from owning a gun in order to prosecute them, the Court made it harder for the federal government to enforce immigration law.<ref>Multiple references:
*Dinan, Stephen (June 21, 2019). [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/jun/21/justices-rule-gun-possession-felons-must-know-they/ Supreme Court offers gun-possession loophole for illegal immigrants]. ''The Washington Times''. Retrieved June 21, 2019.
*Thomsen, Jacqueline (June 21, 2019). [https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/449715-supreme-court-sides-with-immigrant-in-gun-possession-case Supreme Court sides with immigrant in gun possession case]. ''The Hill''. Retrieved June 21, 2019.
*[https://www.apnews.com/aa9d3576f01a47108d15ee1efd63a708 Justices: Proof needed that person knew he couldn’t have gun]. ''Associated Press''. Retrieved June 21, 2019.
*Strawbridge Robinson, Kimberly (June 21, 2019). [https://news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/high-court-backs-strong-intent-requirement-for-gun-charges High Court Backs Strong Intent Requirement for Gun Charges (1)]. ''Bloomberg Law''. Retrieved June 21, 2019.
*Lee, Evan (June 21, 2019). [https://www.scotusblog.com/2019/06/opinion-analysis-felons-in-possession-must-know-they-are-felons/ Opinion analysis: Felons-in-possession must know they are felons]. ''SCOTUSblog''. Retrieved June 21, 2019.
See also:
*Daley, Kevin (January 13, 2019). [https://dailycaller.com/2019/01/13/supreme-court-gun-illegal-alien/ Supreme Court To Review Illegal Immigrant’s Gun Possession Conviction]. ''The Daily Caller''. Retrieved June 21, 2019.</ref>
==Number of judicial appointments==
==Number of judicial appointments==