| Line 550: |
Line 550: |
| | *Somin, Ilya (June 20, 2019). [https://reason.com/2019/06/20/a-troubling-supreme-court-decision-on-non-delegation/ A Troubling Supreme Court Decision on Non-Delegation]. ''Reason''. Retrieved June 20, 2019. | | *Somin, Ilya (June 20, 2019). [https://reason.com/2019/06/20/a-troubling-supreme-court-decision-on-non-delegation/ A Troubling Supreme Court Decision on Non-Delegation]. ''Reason''. Retrieved June 20, 2019. |
| | *Canaparo, GianCarlo; Malcolm, John G. (June 21, 2019). [https://www.dailysignal.com/2019/06/21/supreme-court-misses-opportunity-to-stop-congress-outsourcing-its-power/ Supreme Court Misses Opportunity to Stop Congress Outsourcing Its Power]. ''The Daily Signal''. Retrieved June 21, 2019. | | *Canaparo, GianCarlo; Malcolm, John G. (June 21, 2019). [https://www.dailysignal.com/2019/06/21/supreme-court-misses-opportunity-to-stop-congress-outsourcing-its-power/ Supreme Court Misses Opportunity to Stop Congress Outsourcing Its Power]. ''The Daily Signal''. Retrieved June 21, 2019. |
| − | *Severino, Carrie (June 21, 2019). [https://www.nationalreview.com/bench-memos/fragmented-gundy-court-suggests-the-nondelegation-doctrine-might-have-a-future/ The Fragmented Gundy Court Suggests the Nondelegation Doctrine Might Have a Future]. ''National Review''. Retrieved June 21, 2019.</ref> Additionally, while the case did not exactly revolve around immigration, by ruling that the government needed to prove that an illegal migrant knew that he or she was banned from owning a gun in order to prosecute them, the Court made it harder for the federal government to enforce immigration law.<ref>Multiple references: | + | *Severino, Carrie (June 21, 2019). [https://www.nationalreview.com/bench-memos/fragmented-gundy-court-suggests-the-nondelegation-doctrine-might-have-a-future/ The Fragmented Gundy Court Suggests the Nondelegation Doctrine Might Have a Future]. ''National Review''. Retrieved June 21, 2019. |
| | + | *Sherman, Mark (June 21, 2019). [https://apnews.com/f7e6b13c4c784beaae40d0ee97bc0679 Alito suggests chance to rein in federal agency power]. ''Associated Press''. Retrieved June 22, 2019.</ref> Additionally, while the case did not exactly revolve around immigration, by ruling that the government needed to prove that an illegal migrant knew that he or she was banned from owning a gun in order to prosecute them, the Court made it harder for the federal government to enforce immigration law.<ref>Multiple references: |
| | *Dinan, Stephen (June 21, 2019). [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/jun/21/justices-rule-gun-possession-felons-must-know-they/ Supreme Court offers gun-possession loophole for illegal immigrants]. ''The Washington Times''. Retrieved June 21, 2019. | | *Dinan, Stephen (June 21, 2019). [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/jun/21/justices-rule-gun-possession-felons-must-know-they/ Supreme Court offers gun-possession loophole for illegal immigrants]. ''The Washington Times''. Retrieved June 21, 2019. |
| | *Thomsen, Jacqueline (June 21, 2019). [https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/449715-supreme-court-sides-with-immigrant-in-gun-possession-case Supreme Court sides with immigrant in gun possession case]. ''The Hill''. Retrieved June 21, 2019. | | *Thomsen, Jacqueline (June 21, 2019). [https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/449715-supreme-court-sides-with-immigrant-in-gun-possession-case Supreme Court sides with immigrant in gun possession case]. ''The Hill''. Retrieved June 21, 2019. |