4,994
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 48:
Line 48: − + Line 87:
Line 87: + +
Debate:Are the Democrats capable of fighting terrorism? (view source)
Revision as of 17:12, May 10, 2007
, 17:12, May 10, 2007If you want to have a section for this position, create a section for it. Changing the heading distorts the apparent positions of those commenting within the section.
They've always been capable. Question should be are Democrats willing? To put an end to terrorism? Nancy Pelosi showed us her willingness to appease those that sponsor it. If only she had waved a piece of paper upon her return and said "Peace in our time!" Or at least posed on an anti-aircraft gun overlooking the Golan Heights. But there are plenty of Democrats in the armed forces right now. The let down is the Democratic leadership at the State and Federal levels.--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 20:02, 20 April 2007 (EDT)
They've always been capable. Question should be are Democrats willing? To put an end to terrorism? Nancy Pelosi showed us her willingness to appease those that sponsor it. If only she had waved a piece of paper upon her return and said "Peace in our time!" Or at least posed on an anti-aircraft gun overlooking the Golan Heights. But there are plenty of Democrats in the armed forces right now. The let down is the Democratic leadership at the State and Federal levels.--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 20:02, 20 April 2007 (EDT)
==Are the Republicans capable of fighting terrorism? YES, they are.==
==Are the Republicans capable of fighting terrorism? ==
Does the question "is X capable of fighting terrorism" mean anything? Probably not, but lets pretend it does.
Does the question "is X capable of fighting terrorism" mean anything? Probably not, but lets pretend it does.
See? Terrorist bombs<Catastrophic sea level rise and desertification
See? Terrorist bombs<Catastrophic sea level rise and desertification
--<font color="#222222" face="Times New Roman">Wik</font><font color="#444444" face="Times New Roman">i</font><font color="#666666" face="Times New Roman">nterpreter</font>'''<sup>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Wikinterpreter Liaise with the cabal?]</sup>
--<font color="#222222" face="Times New Roman">Wik</font><font color="#444444" face="Times New Roman">i</font><font color="#666666" face="Times New Roman">nterpreter</font>'''<sup>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Wikinterpreter Liaise with the cabal?]</sup>
==Are the Republicans capable of fighting terrorism? YES, they are.==