Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, Check users, delete, edit, move, oversight, protect, rollback, Administrators
51,035
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 495:
Line 495: − + + + + + + + + + + + +
Donald Trump achievements: The courts (view source)
Revision as of 02:36, June 28, 2019
, 02:36, June 28, 2019→2019
*Gresko, Jessica (June 24, 2019). [https://www.apnews.com/f0767a6ce1aa4dde88fe53b5f1392477 High court strikes down ‘scandalous’ part of trademark law]. ''Associated Press''. Retrieved June 24, 2019.
*Gresko, Jessica (June 24, 2019). [https://www.apnews.com/f0767a6ce1aa4dde88fe53b5f1392477 High court strikes down ‘scandalous’ part of trademark law]. ''Associated Press''. Retrieved June 24, 2019.
*Chung, Andrew (June 24, 2019). [https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-profanity/supreme-court-allows-foul-language-trademarks-in-f-word-case-idUSKCN1TP1TQ Supreme Court allows foul language trademarks in F-word case]. ''Reuters''. Retrieved June 24, 2019.
*Chung, Andrew (June 24, 2019). [https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-profanity/supreme-court-allows-foul-language-trademarks-in-f-word-case-idUSKCN1TP1TQ Supreme Court allows foul language trademarks in F-word case]. ''Reuters''. Retrieved June 24, 2019.
*Haynes, Danielle (June 24, 2019). [https://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2019/06/24/Supreme-Court-strikes-down-law-against-scandalous-trademarks/3291561399016/ Supreme Court strikes down law against 'scandalous' trademarks]. ''UPI''. Retrieved June 26, 2019.</ref>
*Haynes, Danielle (June 24, 2019). [https://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2019/06/24/Supreme-Court-strikes-down-law-against-scandalous-trademarks/3291561399016/ Supreme Court strikes down law against 'scandalous' trademarks]. ''UPI''. Retrieved June 26, 2019.</ref> Importantly, the Court ruled that the federal courts must stay out of political [[gerrymandering]] disputes.<ref>Multiple references:
*Horowitz, Daniel (June 27, 2019). [https://www.conservativereview.com/news/upshot-todays-scotus-rulings-courts-god-except-one-rare-circumstance/ Upshot of today’s SCOTUS rulings: Courts are God except for one ‘rare circumstance’]. ''Conservative Review''. Retrieved June 27, 2019.
*Bravin, Jess; Kendall, Brent (June 27, 2019). [https://www.wsj.com/articles/supreme-court-political-gerrymander-ruling-11561642594 Supreme Court Declines to Set Limits on Political Gerrymandering]. ''The Wall Street Journal''. Retrieved June 27, 2019.
*Blitzer, Ronn; Mears, Bill (June 27, 2019). [https://www.foxnews.com/politics/supreme-court-says-gerrymandering-claims-beyond-reach-of-federal-courts Supreme Court says federal judges have no role in policing gerrymandering, leaving political maps in place]. ''Fox News''. Retrieved June 27, 2019.
*Swoyer, Alex (June 27, 2019). [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/jun/27/scotus-federal-courts-cant-police-gerrymandering/ Supreme Court rules federal courts can't police partisan gerrymandering]. ''The Washington Times''. Retrieved June 27, 2019.
*Chung, Andrew; Hurley, Lawrence (June 27, 2019). [https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-gerrymandering/in-major-elections-ruling-u-s-supreme-court-allows-partisan-map-drawing-idUSKCN1TS24Z In major elections ruling, U.S. Supreme Court allows partisan map drawing]. ''Reuters''. Retrieved June 27, 2019.
*Thomsen, Jacqueline (June 27, 2019). [https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/450623-supreme-court-rules-that-courts-cant-rule-in-political-partisan Supreme Court finds that courts can't rule on partisan gerrymandering cases]. ''The Hill''. Retrieved June 27, 2019.
*Quinn, Melissa (June 27, 2019). [https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/courts/supreme-court-rules-partisan-gerrymandering-claims-cannot-be-heard-by-federal-courts Supreme Court rules partisan gerrymandering claims cannot be heard by federal courts]. ''Washington Examiner''. Retrieved June 27, 2019.
*Sherman, Mark; Gresko, Jessica (June 27, 2019). [https://www.apnews.com/54daa625511445969fee66696f7979c2 Justices: Partisan gerrymandering none of our business]. ''Associated Press''. Retrieved June 27, 2019.
*Higgins, Tucker (June 27, 2019). [https://www.cnbc.com/2019/06/27/supreme-court-decides-that-courts-cannot-block-gerrymandering.html Supreme Court decides federal judges cannot block gerrymandering]. ''CNBC''. Retrieved June 27, 2019.
See also:
*Severino, Carrie (June 27, 2019). [https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/carrie-severino-supreme-court-gerrymandering-decision-constitution Carrie Severino: Supreme Court's gerrymandering decision has one big winner]. ''Fox News''. Retrieved June 27, 2019.</ref>
On immigration, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Trump Administration's conservative policies, ruling that the federal government could detain immigrants with criminal records for deportation anytime after their release from prison, rather than just at the very moment of their release.<ref>Multiple references:
On immigration, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Trump Administration's conservative policies, ruling that the federal government could detain immigrants with criminal records for deportation anytime after their release from prison, rather than just at the very moment of their release.<ref>Multiple references: