Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, Check users, delete, edit, move, oversight, protect, rollback, Administrators
51,035
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 505:
Line 505: + Line 595:
Line 596: − + +
Donald Trump achievements: The courts (view source)
Revision as of 20:49, June 28, 2019
, 20:49, June 28, 2019→2019: Refs.
*Chung, Andrew (June 24, 2019). [https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-profanity/supreme-court-allows-foul-language-trademarks-in-f-word-case-idUSKCN1TP1TQ Supreme Court allows foul language trademarks in F-word case]. ''Reuters''. Retrieved June 24, 2019.
*Chung, Andrew (June 24, 2019). [https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-profanity/supreme-court-allows-foul-language-trademarks-in-f-word-case-idUSKCN1TP1TQ Supreme Court allows foul language trademarks in F-word case]. ''Reuters''. Retrieved June 24, 2019.
*Haynes, Danielle (June 24, 2019). [https://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2019/06/24/Supreme-Court-strikes-down-law-against-scandalous-trademarks/3291561399016/ Supreme Court strikes down law against 'scandalous' trademarks]. ''UPI''. Retrieved June 26, 2019.</ref> Importantly, the Court ruled that the federal courts must stay out of political [[gerrymandering]] disputes.<ref>Multiple references:
*Haynes, Danielle (June 24, 2019). [https://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2019/06/24/Supreme-Court-strikes-down-law-against-scandalous-trademarks/3291561399016/ Supreme Court strikes down law against 'scandalous' trademarks]. ''UPI''. Retrieved June 26, 2019.</ref> Importantly, the Court ruled that the federal courts must stay out of political [[gerrymandering]] disputes.<ref>Multiple references:
*Byas, Steve (June 28, 2019). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/item/32721-supreme-court-gets-it-right-on-redistricting-decision Supreme Court Gets It Right on Redistricting Decision]. ''The New American''. Retrieved June 28, 2019.
*Horowitz, Daniel (June 27, 2019). [https://www.conservativereview.com/news/upshot-todays-scotus-rulings-courts-god-except-one-rare-circumstance/ Upshot of today’s SCOTUS rulings: Courts are God except for one ‘rare circumstance’]. ''Conservative Review''. Retrieved June 27, 2019.
*Horowitz, Daniel (June 27, 2019). [https://www.conservativereview.com/news/upshot-todays-scotus-rulings-courts-god-except-one-rare-circumstance/ Upshot of today’s SCOTUS rulings: Courts are God except for one ‘rare circumstance’]. ''Conservative Review''. Retrieved June 27, 2019.
*Klukowski, Ken (June 27, 2019). [https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/06/27/supreme-court-judges-lack-power-over-partisan-gerrymanders/ Supreme Court: Judges Lack Power over Partisan Gerrymanders]. ''Conservative Review''. Retrieved June 27, 2019.
*Klukowski, Ken (June 27, 2019). [https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/06/27/supreme-court-judges-lack-power-over-partisan-gerrymanders/ Supreme Court: Judges Lack Power over Partisan Gerrymanders]. ''Conservative Review''. Retrieved June 27, 2019.
*Canaparo, GianCarlo; Malcolm, John G. (June 21, 2019). [https://www.dailysignal.com/2019/06/21/supreme-court-misses-opportunity-to-stop-congress-outsourcing-its-power/ Supreme Court Misses Opportunity to Stop Congress Outsourcing Its Power]. ''The Daily Signal''. Retrieved June 21, 2019.
*Canaparo, GianCarlo; Malcolm, John G. (June 21, 2019). [https://www.dailysignal.com/2019/06/21/supreme-court-misses-opportunity-to-stop-congress-outsourcing-its-power/ Supreme Court Misses Opportunity to Stop Congress Outsourcing Its Power]. ''The Daily Signal''. Retrieved June 21, 2019.
*Severino, Carrie (June 21, 2019). [https://www.nationalreview.com/bench-memos/fragmented-gundy-court-suggests-the-nondelegation-doctrine-might-have-a-future/ The Fragmented Gundy Court Suggests the Nondelegation Doctrine Might Have a Future]. ''National Review''. Retrieved June 21, 2019.
*Severino, Carrie (June 21, 2019). [https://www.nationalreview.com/bench-memos/fragmented-gundy-court-suggests-the-nondelegation-doctrine-might-have-a-future/ The Fragmented Gundy Court Suggests the Nondelegation Doctrine Might Have a Future]. ''National Review''. Retrieved June 21, 2019.
*Sherman, Mark (June 21, 2019). [https://apnews.com/f7e6b13c4c784beaae40d0ee97bc0679 Alito suggests chance to rein in federal agency power]. ''Associated Press''. Retrieved June 22, 2019.</ref> Additionally, while the case did not exactly revolve around immigration, by ruling that the government needed to prove that an illegal migrant knew that he or she was banned from owning a gun in order to prosecute them, the Court made it harder for the federal government to enforce immigration law.<ref>Multiple references:
*Sherman, Mark (June 21, 2019). [https://apnews.com/f7e6b13c4c784beaae40d0ee97bc0679 Alito suggests chance to rein in federal agency power]. ''Associated Press''. Retrieved June 22, 2019.
*Owens, Ryan J. (June 28, 2019). [https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/450365-to-protect-liberty-the-supreme-court-must-apply-nondelegation-doctrine To protect liberty, the Supreme Court must apply nondelegation doctrine]. ''The Hill''. Retrieved June 28, 2019.</ref> Additionally, while the case did not exactly revolve around immigration, by ruling that the government needed to prove that an illegal migrant knew that he or she was banned from owning a gun in order to prosecute them, the Court made it harder for the federal government to enforce immigration law.<ref>Multiple references:
*Dinan, Stephen (June 21, 2019). [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/jun/21/justices-rule-gun-possession-felons-must-know-they/ Supreme Court offers gun-possession loophole for illegal immigrants]. ''The Washington Times''. Retrieved June 21, 2019.
*Dinan, Stephen (June 21, 2019). [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/jun/21/justices-rule-gun-possession-felons-must-know-they/ Supreme Court offers gun-possession loophole for illegal immigrants]. ''The Washington Times''. Retrieved June 21, 2019.
*Thomsen, Jacqueline (June 21, 2019). [https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/449715-supreme-court-sides-with-immigrant-in-gun-possession-case Supreme Court sides with immigrant in gun possession case]. ''The Hill''. Retrieved June 21, 2019.
*Thomsen, Jacqueline (June 21, 2019). [https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/449715-supreme-court-sides-with-immigrant-in-gun-possession-case Supreme Court sides with immigrant in gun possession case]. ''The Hill''. Retrieved June 21, 2019.