Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, Check users, delete, edit, move, oversight, protect, rollback, Administrators
51,035
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 620:
Line 620: +
Donald Trump achievements: The courts (view source)
Revision as of 13:35, July 5, 2019
, 13:35, July 5, 2019→2019: Ref.
*McManus, John F. (June 25, 2019). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/reviews/opinion/item/32694-maryland-peace-cross Supreme Court Rejects Humanist Arguments Against "Peace Cross"]. ''The New American''. Retrieved June 25, 2019.
*McManus, John F. (June 25, 2019). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/reviews/opinion/item/32694-maryland-peace-cross Supreme Court Rejects Humanist Arguments Against "Peace Cross"]. ''The New American''. Retrieved June 25, 2019.
*Bermudez, Julio; Price, Travis (July 2, 2019). [https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/op-eds/the-peace-cross-remains-and-weve-not-forgotten-history The Peace Cross remains, and we’ve not forgotten history]. ''Washington Examiner''. Retrieved July 2, 2019.
*Bermudez, Julio; Price, Travis (July 2, 2019). [https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/op-eds/the-peace-cross-remains-and-weve-not-forgotten-history The Peace Cross remains, and we’ve not forgotten history]. ''Washington Examiner''. Retrieved July 2, 2019.
*Shackelford, Kelly (July 5, 2019). [https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/kelly-shackelford-its-morning-in-america-again-for-religious-liberty Kelly Shackelford: Supreme Court will no longer tolerate government hostility to religious beliefs]. ''Fox News''. Retrieved July 5, 2019.
*Horowitz, Daniel (June 20, 2019). [https://www.conservativereview.com/news/bladensburg-cross-pyrrhic-victory-conservatives-supreme-court/ Bladensburg Cross a Pyrrhic victory for conservatives at Supreme Court]. ''Conservative Review''. Retrieved June 20, 2019.</ref>
*Horowitz, Daniel (June 20, 2019). [https://www.conservativereview.com/news/bladensburg-cross-pyrrhic-victory-conservatives-supreme-court/ Bladensburg Cross a Pyrrhic victory for conservatives at Supreme Court]. ''Conservative Review''. Retrieved June 20, 2019.</ref>