Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,124
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 21:
Line 21: + + + + + +
→Newman Centers out, but G.K. Chesterton, Thomas Aquinas and Peter Kreeft could be added: new section
The Cosmological Argument is presented in a way which seems to contradict itself right now. First it says that everything has a cause, and then in the next sentence it states there is something that is not caused. If that's true then there is no reason to assume that everything has a cause. It's very confusing the way it's laid out right now. --[[Glenwing]] 1:35, 7 May 2012 (MST)
The Cosmological Argument is presented in a way which seems to contradict itself right now. First it says that everything has a cause, and then in the next sentence it states there is something that is not caused. If that's true then there is no reason to assume that everything has a cause. It's very confusing the way it's laid out right now. --[[Glenwing]] 1:35, 7 May 2012 (MST)
== Newman Centers out, but G.K. Chesterton, Thomas Aquinas and Peter Kreeft could be added ==
None of the references support the notion that the Newman Centers are known for Christian apologetics. I scoured the internet and found zero support that the Newman Centers are known for Christian apologetics.
There are well-known Catholics known for their apologetic works though. Namely, [[G.K. Chesterton]], [[Thomas Aquinas]] and Peter Kreeft. These men could certainly be added to the article. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 03:15, 14 July 2019 (EDT)