Changes

Pro-aborts often prefer the [[euphemism]] "[[pro-choice]]" as a way of denying their support, explicit or implicit, for abortion at public expense. Conservatives believe that the label "pro-choice" is a misnomer because the child does not have a choice and pro-aborts typically oppose any choice for the father. Pro-aborts often oppose any choice by pro-life physicians, nurses or pharmacists.  While NARAL (an organization that advocates legal abortion) supports narrow conscience clauses, it opposes broader clauses that would allow physicans, pharmacists, and employers to refuse to support abortion.<ref>http://www.prochoiceamerica.org/media/fact-sheets/abortion-refusal-clauses-dangerous.pdf</ref>  Pro-aborts also typically oppose ensuring that women have information about the medical harms, such as increased suicide rates, that result from abortion.<ref>[https://www.reuters.com/article/2012/07/24/us-usa-abortion-southdakota-idUSBRE86N1DM20120724 Planned Parenthood Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota unsuccessfully opposed a suicide advisory pro-life law in South Dakota]</ref>

Pro-aborts often prefer the [[euphemism]] "[[pro-choice]]" as a way of denying their support, explicit or implicit, for abortion at public expense. Conservatives believe that the label "pro-choice" is a misnomer because the child does not have a choice and pro-aborts typically oppose any choice for the father. Pro-aborts often oppose any choice by pro-life physicians, nurses or pharmacists.  While NARAL (an organization that advocates legal abortion) supports narrow conscience clauses, it opposes broader clauses that would allow physicans, pharmacists, and employers to refuse to support abortion.<ref>http://www.prochoiceamerica.org/media/fact-sheets/abortion-refusal-clauses-dangerous.pdf</ref>  Pro-aborts also typically oppose ensuring that women have information about the medical harms, such as increased suicide rates, that result from abortion.<ref>[https://www.reuters.com/article/2012/07/24/us-usa-abortion-southdakota-idUSBRE86N1DM20120724 Planned Parenthood Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota unsuccessfully opposed a suicide advisory pro-life law in South Dakota]</ref>

=="Pro-choice" Hypocrisy==

=="Pro-choice" hypocrisy==

The pro-abortion movement always attempts to justify itself is with the term "pro-choice". They claim to support a mother's "choice" to abort her unborn child, but many either don't support a mother's choice literally to ''keep'' her unborn child or they dismiss occurrences of such as isolated incidents.  

The pro-abortion movement always attempts to justify itself is with the term "pro-choice". They claim to support a mother's "choice" to abort her unborn child, but many either don't support a mother's choice literally to ''keep'' her unborn child or they dismiss occurrences of such as isolated incidents.  

In December 2011, a 14 year-old pregnant teen sued several family members for attempting to coerce her into an abortion. Her attorney representing her, Stephen Casey, attested that the girl's cousin was guilty of assaulting her and threatening to beat her if she did not get an abortion. The teen later got a restraining order from the lawsuit.<ref>[https://www.lifenews.com/2012/01/10/teen-spared-for-two-more-weeks-from-parents-forcing-abortion/ Teen Spared For Two More Weeks From Parents Forcing Abortion]</ref>  

In December 2011, a 14 year-old pregnant teen sued several family members for attempting to coerce her into an abortion. Her attorney representing her, Stephen Casey, attested that the girl's cousin was guilty of assaulting her and threatening to beat her if she did not get an abortion. The teen later got a restraining order from her family following the lawsuit.<ref>[https://www.lifenews.com/2012/01/10/teen-spared-for-two-more-weeks-from-parents-forcing-abortion/ Teen Spared For Two More Weeks From Parents Forcing Abortion]</ref>  

In February 2013, a 16 year-old pregnant teen from Texas sued her parents for trying to force her to get an abortion. The teen said that her mother invited her paternal grandparents to a bar where her mother suggested slipping an abortion pill through deception. The teen also stated that her father intended to get her an abortion simply because it was his decision, as well as her parents further "punishing" her by taking away her phone, keeping her from school, and taking away her car.<ref>[https://www.lifenews.com/2013/02/12/teen-girl-sues-parents-to-stop-them-from-forcing-her-abortion/ Teen Girl Sues Parents to Stop Them From Forcing Her Abortion]</ref>

In February 2013, a 16 year-old pregnant teen from Texas sued her parents for trying to force her to get an abortion. The teen said that her mother invited her paternal grandparents to a bar where her mother suggested slipping an abortion pill through deception. The teen also stated that her father intended to get her an abortion simply because it was his decision, as well as her parents further "punishing" her by taking away her phone, keeping her from school, and taking away her car.<ref>[https://www.lifenews.com/2013/02/12/teen-girl-sues-parents-to-stop-them-from-forcing-her-abortion/ Teen Girl Sues Parents to Stop Them From Forcing Her Abortion]</ref>