Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
← Older edit
Newer edit →
Argument from consciousness
(view source)
Revision as of 00:20, August 14, 2019
10 bytes added
,
00:20, August 14, 2019
no edit summary
Line 16:
Line 16:
* The elements themselves which we consist of, and nature itself, have no consciousness.
* The elements themselves which we consist of, and nature itself, have no consciousness.
* Despite our elements themselves having no consciousness, we do.
* Despite our elements themselves having no consciousness, we do.
−
* Consciousness
can
not
happen by
blind natural forces, therefore there must be a being who supply that to us.
+
* Consciousness
could
not
originate through
blind natural forces, therefore there must be a being who supply that to us.
* Infinite regress of beings is illogical, therefore a single, uncaused causer must be the causer of consciousness.
* Infinite regress of beings is illogical, therefore a single, uncaused causer must be the causer of consciousness.
* This uncaused causer of the conscience is [[God]]
* This uncaused causer of the conscience is [[God]]
Conservative
Irenaeus, Siteadmin,
Check users
, oversight,
Administrators
351,421
edits
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Article
talk page
Variants
Views
Read
View source
View history
More
Search
Popular Links
Main Page
Recent changes
New Pages
Random page
Statistics
Edit Console
Special pages
Printable version