Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
844 bytes added ,  17:03, August 15, 2019
final comment that I will prob not be with Conservapedia much beyond spring of next year
Line 33: Line 33:  
::::::Which brings me to the fact that when the disruption originally arose I had not yet gotten around to finally checking all the links I had put in this article. Turns out that the definition of '''auctoritas''' I thought would be found on two online dictionary sites did not exist. I need to find another resource explaining its meaning. Second, and finally, I had intended to include the inconsistent contradiction of the biblehub.com article on Strong's number G4074 Πέτρος, in particular the fact that on the same page that says that "Petros" is a large rock, boulder, massive rock equal to G4073 "petra", a large rock, boulder, cliff—''on the same page''—the scholar Abbot-Smith is cited, one of the erroneous sources that state that Petros is a "pebble" or small rock along a pathway that can be picked up and thrown by hand'''!''' A "large rock, massive boulder" is not a "pebble" or "small stone". I have found (as did some of the sources quoted by Conservative in the article) that this contradicts the expertise of established Greek linguists over the past 2 centuries! I wanted to emphasize that this error has been cited by apologists who oppose Petrine Primacy, and that they cannot successfully use this error as a supportive factor in defense of their apologetic against Catholicism. They can in fact use other legitimate factors in their interpretive argument—its just that this one has no substance. It is in fact a [[falsehood]], even if the apologist never intended to [[lie]] (and I don't normally believe they do, since almost all of them are devout Christians, its just that they are simply unaware of an error they thought was a reliable fact). I can only finish making these corrections if the article is unlocked. I "promise to be a good boy" and not "ruin" the Protestant section, with 1990's guy refereeing the game, if it is left unlocked. --[[User:Dataclarifier|Dataclarifier]] ([[User talk:Dataclarifier|talk]]) 11:56, 15 August 2019 (EDT)
 
::::::Which brings me to the fact that when the disruption originally arose I had not yet gotten around to finally checking all the links I had put in this article. Turns out that the definition of '''auctoritas''' I thought would be found on two online dictionary sites did not exist. I need to find another resource explaining its meaning. Second, and finally, I had intended to include the inconsistent contradiction of the biblehub.com article on Strong's number G4074 Πέτρος, in particular the fact that on the same page that says that "Petros" is a large rock, boulder, massive rock equal to G4073 "petra", a large rock, boulder, cliff—''on the same page''—the scholar Abbot-Smith is cited, one of the erroneous sources that state that Petros is a "pebble" or small rock along a pathway that can be picked up and thrown by hand'''!''' A "large rock, massive boulder" is not a "pebble" or "small stone". I have found (as did some of the sources quoted by Conservative in the article) that this contradicts the expertise of established Greek linguists over the past 2 centuries! I wanted to emphasize that this error has been cited by apologists who oppose Petrine Primacy, and that they cannot successfully use this error as a supportive factor in defense of their apologetic against Catholicism. They can in fact use other legitimate factors in their interpretive argument—its just that this one has no substance. It is in fact a [[falsehood]], even if the apologist never intended to [[lie]] (and I don't normally believe they do, since almost all of them are devout Christians, its just that they are simply unaware of an error they thought was a reliable fact). I can only finish making these corrections if the article is unlocked. I "promise to be a good boy" and not "ruin" the Protestant section, with 1990's guy refereeing the game, if it is left unlocked. --[[User:Dataclarifier|Dataclarifier]] ([[User talk:Dataclarifier|talk]]) 11:56, 15 August 2019 (EDT)
 
I will unlock the article. Be sure to respect the work I put into the Protestant section. I don't want my work vaporized. We both agree now that I created something worthwhile via my research.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 12:31, 15 August 2019 (EDT)
 
I will unlock the article. Be sure to respect the work I put into the Protestant section. I don't want my work vaporized. We both agree now that I created something worthwhile via my research.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 12:31, 15 August 2019 (EDT)
 +
 +
::::::I do not expect to be continuing with Conservapedia much beyond spring of next year. I am only  going through Harmony of the Gospel (Conservative Version) one more time to see if it needs to be refined for improvement. After that I probably won't have the energy to do more. I'll be 73 years old in February, and am still recovering from last year's T.I.A. minor stroke in June-July. The controversy and dispute over this article exhausted me. It'll take me a couple days to recover from this, and then I will make the corrections I mentioned above. I can understand your need to get away from the controversy and legitimate concern about preserving your contribution, which is an improvement. <br>That's all for now. I wish you well. --[[User:Dataclarifier|Dataclarifier]] ([[User talk:Dataclarifier|talk]]) 13:03, 15 August 2019 (EDT)
Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, edit, move, protect
30,891

edits

Navigation menu