Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,411
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 4:
Line 4: + + + + + + +
no edit summary
The atheist [[Luke Muehlhauser]], defines counter-apologetics as "a response to [[Christian apologetics]]...examining the claims and tactics of Christian apologists and then equipping [a thinker] with [[skepticism|skeptical]] responses to them"<ref>Muehlhauser, Luke (March 26, 2010), "[Counter-Apologetics: What is Counter-Apologetics?]", Common Sense Atheism (blog)</ref>
The atheist [[Luke Muehlhauser]], defines counter-apologetics as "a response to [[Christian apologetics]]...examining the claims and tactics of Christian apologists and then equipping [a thinker] with [[skepticism|skeptical]] responses to them"<ref>Muehlhauser, Luke (March 26, 2010), "[Counter-Apologetics: What is Counter-Apologetics?]", Common Sense Atheism (blog)</ref>
[[Atheist apologetics]] have been very ineffective. The atheist [[Sam Harris]] quipped about [[William Lane Craig]] that he was "The one Christian apologist who seems to have put the fear of God into many of my fellow atheists".<ref>[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xpM0D-MHyzs William Lane Craig Puts the Fear of God in Atheists], video clip of the [[William Lane Craig vs. Sam Harris debate]]</ref><ref>[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yqaHXKLRKzg The God Debate II: Harris vs. Craig], University of Notre Dame YouTube channel</ref>
Luke Muehlhauser wrote:
{{Cquote|As far as I can tell, he has won nearly all his debates with atheists. When debating him, atheists have consistently failed to put forward solid arguments, and consistently failed to point out the flaws in Craig’s arguments...
This is especially embarrassing for atheists because Craig’s arguments and debates are easily available, and he uses the same arguments all the time. So it should be easy for atheists to prepare for a debate with Craig.<ref>[http://commonsenseatheism.com/?p=392#more-392 William Lane Craig’s Debates (Reviews)]</ref>}}