SkipCaptcha
339
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: + + +
no edit summary
Can we please reach consensus on this article? I would delete most of the recently added material about government spying and the Brandeis quote. The article should explain what a wiki does and how it works. Giving Wikipedia and Conservapedia as examples is fine. Stating that public wikis can be read by anyone is also fine. After that, it goes off track with many red links and poor category choices. A wiki is no more subject to spying than any other public website. Thanks, [[User:Wschact|Wschact]] 14:22, 5 February 2015 (EST)
Can we please reach consensus on this article? I would delete most of the recently added material about government spying and the Brandeis quote. The article should explain what a wiki does and how it works. Giving Wikipedia and Conservapedia as examples is fine. Stating that public wikis can be read by anyone is also fine. After that, it goes off track with many red links and poor category choices. A wiki is no more subject to spying than any other public website. Thanks, [[User:Wschact|Wschact]] 14:22, 5 February 2015 (EST)
==It is==
I hope no one minds but I have changed "it's" to "it is" to make style more encyclopedic. [[User:Carltonio|Carltonio]] ([[User talk:Carltonio|talk]]) 15:52, 23 August 2019 (EDT)