368
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 65:
Line 65: + + + + + + + + + + +
→Evolution
:Eventually, I hope to clarify these points. Perhaps you can help. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 11:30, 11 May 2007 (EDT)
:Eventually, I hope to clarify these points. Perhaps you can help. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 11:30, 11 May 2007 (EDT)
That should be in an article about various creation ideas (creation mythologies, ID, unguided evolution, theistic evolution, etc...).
When astronomers refer to the evolution of the universe they use the word like you used it in This website has "evolved".
They mean that over time atoms packed together to form stars and groups of stars formed galaxies, that sort of thing.
These are events that everyone can agree on, so I don't see why it is attacked by the author.
Same goes for the reference to an eternal universe, no evolutionist, or creationist believes in an eternal universe, so again, why is it in here?
[[User:MiddleMan|MiddleMan]]