Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 597: Line 597:  
I think it's definitely conservative (in fact, given how Pixar is going Left, it may be the LAST conservative one they ever make as they've fallen a long way from the conservative days of Toy Story and A Bugs Life)) but it also has a weak storyline and was Pixar's first box office disappointment.  [[User:PatriotMongoose|PatriotMongoose]] ([[User talk:PatriotMongoose|talk]]) 15:15, 17 August 2019 (EDT)
 
I think it's definitely conservative (in fact, given how Pixar is going Left, it may be the LAST conservative one they ever make as they've fallen a long way from the conservative days of Toy Story and A Bugs Life)) but it also has a weak storyline and was Pixar's first box office disappointment.  [[User:PatriotMongoose|PatriotMongoose]] ([[User talk:PatriotMongoose|talk]]) 15:15, 17 August 2019 (EDT)
 
:Wait, I don't see how Ace Ventura has anything to do with Pixar. [[User:Pokeria1|Pokeria1]] ([[User talk:Pokeria1|talk]]) 15:55, 17 August 2019 (EDT)
 
:Wait, I don't see how Ace Ventura has anything to do with Pixar. [[User:Pokeria1|Pokeria1]] ([[User talk:Pokeria1|talk]]) 15:55, 17 August 2019 (EDT)
 +
 +
==A mild concern about a Dog's Purpose and a similar recent film (also mostly conservative), The Art of Racing in the Rain (2019)==
 +
 +
Both of them seem to promote reincarnation.  In A Dog's Purpose, Bailey comes back as several other dogs (including a female, once, which I wondered if it was a subtle transgender reference).  In Art of Racing in the Rain, Enzo dies (off screen) at the end and, per his long time desire, appears to have come back as a human boy named Enzo.  I'm just wondering if these movies are secretly pushing Hinduism or that mentality.  I suppose every film has it's questionable elements, though.  Otherwise two good movies. 
 +
 +
[[User:PatriotMongoose|PatriotMongoose]] ([[User talk:PatriotMongoose|talk]]) 22:52, 28 August 2019 (EDT)
SkipCaptcha
360

edits

Navigation menu