In ''The Coherence of Theism'' he examines the claims of theism and comes to provisional conclusions that [[theism]] is not demonstrably incoherent, and that a more feasible but indirect way of arguing for the coherence of theism is to provide grounds for thinking that theism is most probably true. | In ''The Coherence of Theism'' he examines the claims of theism and comes to provisional conclusions that [[theism]] is not demonstrably incoherent, and that a more feasible but indirect way of arguing for the coherence of theism is to provide grounds for thinking that theism is most probably true. |