1,266 bytes added
, 19:26, May 11, 2007
Since [[Special:Listusers%26group%3Dsysop|sysops]] seem to make up rules as they go along [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Ed_Poor&diff=next&oldid=136691] a policy that has some reasonable checks on deletions, except where there is a rule violation is a bit pointless because an editor can never know what a particular [[Special:Listusers%26group%3Dsysop|sysop's]] rules are. Conservapedia really only has one rule found [[Conservapedia:Locks and Blocks|here]].
:''Sysop's and Bureaucrats are the Administrators of Conservapedia. Their instructions, as to Conservapedia policy and/or the appropriateness or inappropriateness of user actions, are to be followed. Failure to do so will result in the user being blocked.''
Put in lay language that means
:''Sysops may do whatever they want, everyone else has to do what they are told.''
If a [[Special:Listusers%26group%3Dsysop|sysop]] feels something is inappropriate they should just take what ever action they deem necessary. If a [[Special:Listusers%26group%3Dsysop|sysop]] was not capable of doing this in the best interests of Conservapedia they wouldn't be a [[Special:Listusers%26group%3Dsysop|sysop]]. If it ain't broke why fix it? [[User:Auld Nick|Auld Nick]] 15:26, 11 May 2007 (EDT)