Changes

===Controversy over second wife's state employment===

===Controversy over second wife's state employment===

In 2006, Noble Ellington married his longtime legislative secretary, the former Brenda Anderson Armstrong (born 1961). The second Mrs. Ellington sought to continue as her husband's legislative assistant.<ref>[http://house.louisiana.gov/H_Reps/members.asp?ID=20 Louisiana House of Representatives - Internet Portal<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref> A hearing was to have been held in the 19th District Court in [[Baton Rouge]] on February 19, 2008, to see if she qualified under the state's [[ethics]] laws. However, the case was postponed.<ref>''The Monroe News-Star,'' August 2, 2008.</ref>​

In 2006, Noble Ellington married his longtime legislative secretary, the former Brenda Anderson Armstrong (born 1961). The second Mrs. Ellington sought to continue as her husband's legislative assistant. A hearing was to have been held in the 19th District Court in [[Baton Rouge]] on February 19, 2008, to see if she qualified under the state's [[ethics]] laws. However, the case was postponed.<ref>''The Monroe News-Star,'' August 2, 2008.</ref>​

State District Judge Don Johnson issued a temporary restraining order on January 11, 2008, that Mrs. Ellington could continue in her $54,540-per-year position until a final court decision is rendered.<ref>[http://www.newshorn.com/forums/viewthread/20314/ NewsHorn.com Forums | Louisiana and Ethics, Worlds in Collision<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref> She maintained her position while Ellington served in the Senate because she had worked for him for more than a year before the couple married and had been employed by Ellington since he entered the House in 1988. The Louisiana Ethics Board maintains that the Senate and House are separate bodies so the grandfather clause no longer applied after Ellington returned to the House.  

State District Judge Don Johnson issued a temporary restraining order on January 11, 2008, that Mrs. Ellington could continue in her $54,540-per-year position until a final court decision is rendered.<ref>[http://www.newshorn.com/forums/viewthread/20314/ NewsHorn.com Forums | Louisiana and Ethics, Worlds in Collision<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref> She maintained her position while Ellington served in the Senate because she had worked for him for more than a year before the couple married and had been employed by Ellington since he entered the House in 1988. The Louisiana Ethics Board maintains that the Senate and House are separate bodies so the grandfather clause no longer applied after Ellington returned to the House.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.ktbs.com/news/nepotism-case-fight-on-hold-until-march/article_416f6a6a-63c5-5c5f-a9b2-f0c37ceac0f2.html|title=Nepotism Case Fight On Hold Until March|date=February 20, 2008|publisher=KTBS-TV ([[Shreveport]])|accessdate=September 5, 2019}}</ref>

In their legal argument, the Ellingtons maintained that the legislature is a single body and that Mrs. Ellington's employment should stand.​Ellington said that his wife has "tremendous experience and a great understanding about the needs of the constituents." Then House Clerk Butch Speer said that the Ethics Board's opinion should stand:

In their legal argument, the Ellingtons maintained that the legislature is a single body and that Mrs. Ellington's employment should stand.​Ellington said that his wife has "tremendous experience and a great understanding about the needs of the constituents." Then House Clerk Butch Speer said that the Ethics Board's opinion should stand:

"The House's position is that we have to adhere to the code of ethics. The Ethics Boardis charged by law with interpreting the code, and it said that (Ellington) can't participate in the employment of his wife. But the House is also bound to follow a lawful order of the court. Under the restraining order issued by the 19th Judicial Court, the House isn't to perform any act that would interrupt her employment. Unless or until that order is lifted, she will remain employed. If the order is ever lifted, the House will follow the dictates of the Ethics Board," and Mrs. Ellington would therefore ​be terminated from her position.<ref>''The Monroe News-Star,'' January 29, 2008.</ref>​

"The House's position is that we have to adhere to the code of ethics. The Ethics Boardis charged by law with interpreting the code, and it said that (Ellington) can't participate in the employment of his wife. But the House is also bound to follow a lawful order of the court. Under the restraining order issued by the 19th Judicial Court, the House isn't to perform any act that would interrupt her employment. Unless or until that order is lifted, she will remain employed. If the order is ever lifted, the House will follow the dictates of the Ethics Board," and Mrs. Ellington would therefore ​be terminated from her position.<ref>''The Monroe News-Star,'' January 29, 2008.</ref>​

On May 19, 2008, the state Senate without objection approved an amendment offered by then Senate President Joel Thomas Chaisson, II, of Destrehan in St. Charles Parish  that would erase the court ruling that Mrs. Ellington must resign as her husband's legislative assistant. Chaisson's amendment states that if a lawmaker's spouse is legally an assistant in one chamber of the legislature, a member then being elected to the other body does not change that assistant's employment status.<ref>[http://www.cars.com/go/index.jsp?aff=thetimes The Shreveport Times: Buy New & Used Cars, Research Prices, Sell My Car, Find Auto Dealers<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref>​

On May 19, 2008, the state Senate without objection approved an amendment offered by then Senate President Joel Thomas Chaisson, II, of Destrehan in St. Charles Parish  that would erase the court ruling that Mrs. Ellington must resign as her husband's legislative assistant. Chaisson's amendment states that if a lawmaker's spouse is legally an assistant in one chamber of the legislature, a member then being elected to the other body does not change that assistant's employment status. The Ellingtons also called for Justice Traylor's disbarment on grounds of violating judicial ethics.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://lincolnparishnewsonline.wordpress.com/2010/08/23/traylor-should-be-disbarred-say-ellingtons/|title=Traylor Should be Disbarred, Say Ellingtons|publisher=Lincolnparishnewsonline|accessdate=September 5, 2019}}</ref>

==Political campaigns==

==Political campaigns==