Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
3,026
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 2:
Line 2: − + − +
Affirming the consequent (view source)
Revision as of 17:11, September 12, 2019
, 17:11, September 12, 2019converse
*If ''P,'' then ''Q.''
*If ''P,'' then ''Q.''
*''Q.''
*''Q.''
*Therefore, ''P.''
*Therefore, ''P.'’
The following is an example:
Thus, the fallacy confuses the truth value of a statement with the truth value of its [[converse]]. The following is an example:
*If Jack is meeting an important client today, he will wear his blue suit.
*If Jack is meeting an important client today, he will wear his blue suit.
*Jack is wearing his blue suit.
*Jack is wearing his blue suit.