Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
315 bytes added ,  00:59, May 12, 2007
some clarification, I hope.
Line 1: Line 1: −
A '''fact''' is perhaps best described as a factual statement + [[truth]]. Facts are generally held to be [[mind-independent]], i.e. they would continue to be the case whether or not anyone believed them, or indeed whether or not there were any minds to believe them in the first place.
+
A '''fact''' is perhaps best described as a statement that is [[truth|true]]. Facts are generally held to be [[mind-independent]], i.e. they would continue to be the case whether or not anyone believed them, or indeed whether or not there were any minds to believe them in the first place.
   −
A factual statement has a [[truth value]], that is to say it is ''capable of being true '''or''' false''. Not all statements are of this form, as we can see below:
+
In logic, a [[Statement (logic)|statement]] has a [[truth value]], that is to say it is ''capable of being true '''or''' false''. Not all statements are of this form, as we can see below:
    
1. Table [[salt]] is comprised of [[sodium]] and [[chlorine]].
 
1. Table [[salt]] is comprised of [[sodium]] and [[chlorine]].
Line 30: Line 30:     
In statement 2, the roles are reversed. This time it is the very existence of the subject-entity that allows room for dispute. As all philosophical "proofs" of the existence of God are highly controversial, if not outright failures, the usual fallback position is an assertion of [[faith]]. As it is equally impossible to disprove the existence of God (see [[verification transcendence]]), a [[stalemate]] is the result.
 
In statement 2, the roles are reversed. This time it is the very existence of the subject-entity that allows room for dispute. As all philosophical "proofs" of the existence of God are highly controversial, if not outright failures, the usual fallback position is an assertion of [[faith]]. As it is equally impossible to disprove the existence of God (see [[verification transcendence]]), a [[stalemate]] is the result.
 +
 +
Statement 3 seems pretty straightforward, but if one is working in base 16, it is false (in base 16, 5 + 6 = B, and 8 + 9 = 11).
 +
 +
Statement 4 requires a much more in-depth investigation and understanding of the scientific reasons why the statement would be interpreted as true or false.
2,014

edits

Navigation menu